Analysis of Vocational School Students' Ability in Conceptual Understanding
Abstract
Keywords
Full Text:
PDF (English)References
Hermann, R. S. (2012). Cognitive apartheid: on the manner in which high school students understand evolution without believing in evolution. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 5(4): 619-628.
Hofer, S. I., Schumacher, R., & Rubin, H. (2017). The test of basic Mechanics Conceptual Understanding (bMCU): using Rasch analysis to develop and evaluate an efficient multiple choice test on Newton’s mechanics. International journal of STEM education, 4(1): 18.
Koponen, I. T., & Nousiainen, M. (2018). Concept networks of students’ knowledge of relationships between physics concepts: finding key concepts and their epistemic support. Applied Network Science, 3(1): 14.
Lee, J., & Kim, J. B. (2018). Learning Assistant (LA) instead of Teaching Assistant (TA) in Korea?. Journal of the Korean Physical Society, 73(4): 414-421.
Lidar, M., Danielsson, A. T., & Berge, M. (2018). What Is Construed as Relevant Knowledge in Physics Teaching? Similarities and Differences in How Knowledge and Power Are Staged in Three Lower Secondary Classrooms. Research in science education: 1-20.
Pateda, A. B., Kendek, Y., & Saehana, S. (2015). Analisis Pemahaman Konsep Magnet Mahasiswa Calon Guru Fisika. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Tadulako (JPFT), 3(2): 13-17.
Sabeel, U., & Chandra, N. (2013, September). A Smart and Contemporary Home Security System using 802.15. 4 standard. In 2013 5th International Conference and Computational Intelligence and Communication Networks (pp. 374-379). IEEE.
Sari, W. P., Suyanto, E., & Suana, W. (2017). Analisis Pemahaman Konsep Vektor pada Siswa Sekolah Menengah Atas. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika Al-BiRuNi, 6(2): 159-168.
Sugiyono. (2008). Metode penelitian pendidikan:(pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif dan R & D). Alfabeta.
Sung, S. H. H., Shen, J., Jiang, S., & Chen, G. (2017). Comparing the effects of dynamic computer visualization on undergraduate students’ understanding of osmosis with randomized posttest-only control group design. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 12(1): 26.
Turşucu, S., Spandaw, J., & de Vries, M. J. (2018). Search for Symbol Sense Behavior: Students in Upper Secondary Education Solving Algebraic Physics Problems. Research in Science Education: 1-27.
Bloom, B. S., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals; Handbook I: Cognitive Domain. NY: Longmans, Green
Radiko, E., Kurniawan, Y., & Muliyani, R. (2018). Identifikasi Pemahaman Konsep Siswa Pada Materi Zat dan Wujudnya. JIPF (Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Fisika), 3(2): 52-54.
Rosdianto, H. (2017). Pengaruh Model Generative Learning Terhadap Hasil Belajar Ranah Kognitif Siswa Pada Materi Hukum Newton. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Keilmuan (JPFK), 3(2): 66-69.
Rosdianto, H. (2017). Students` Conceptual Understanding through Generative Learning Model in Topic "Light". JPI (Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia), 6(2): 259-262.
Praptiwi, L., & Handayani, L. (2012). Efektivitas model pembelajaran eksperimen inkuiri terbimbing berbantuan my own dictionary untuk meningkatkan penguasaan konsep dan unjuk kerja siswa SMP RSBI. Unnes Science Education Journal, 1(2): 86-95.
Ahmadi, A., & Supriyono, W. (2013). Psikologi Belajar. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26737/jipf.v4i1.843
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2019 Riskana Br Sitepu, Ani Rusilowati, Bambang Subali, Ahmad Sukron Khafifi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Publisher
Institute of Managing and Publishing of Scientific Journals
STKIP Singkawang
Jl. STKIP, Kelurahan Naram, Kecamatan Singkawang Utara, Kota Singkawang, Kalimantan Barat, Indonesia
Website: http://journal.stkipsingkawang.ac.id/index.php/JIPF
Email: [email protected]
JIPF Indexed by:
Copyright (c) JIPF (Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Fisika)