Profile of Scientific Creativity Based on Project Based Learning of Physics Education Undergraduate Students: Preliminary research

Maimon Sumo; Budi Jatmiko; Zainul Arifin Imam Supardi

doi:10.26737/jipf.v9i3.5802

Profile of Scientific Creativity Based on Project Based Learning of Physics Education Undergraduate Students: Preliminary research

Maimon Sumo, Budi Jatmiko, Zainul Arifin Imam Supardi

Abstract

This research aims to describe the profile of scientific creativity abilities of undergraduate students in the basic physics 1 course through the application of the Project-based Learning model. The sample in this research was 50 undergraduate physics education students at Madura Islamic University taking introductory physics courses. The data obtained was analyzed quantitatively and then described. The students' scientific creativity profile was obtained by administering a scientific creativity test and a student response questionnaire using the implementation of Project Based Learning. The data was analyzed using a score calculation formula, the results were categorized into very high, high, medium and low category. After obtaining the scoring, the data is interpreted in percentage form. Meanwhile, student response questionnaire were measured using Likert scale and then interpreted in percentage form. The research results showed that 83% of students' scientific creativity was still classified as low, while 17% of students' scientific creativity was classified as moderate. With details of the creative personal character profile for each indicator of scientific creativity as follows: 1) Scientific Phenomena 52.5%, 2) Scientific Knowledge 15%, 3) Scientific Problem solving 13.75%, 4) Creative thinking ability 20.4%, 5) advanced scientific product design 12.7 %, and 6) Technical product 8.7%. The results of the student response questionnaire showed that the majority of students experienced difficulty in write their initial knowledge about physics, difficulty in solving problems and answering questions based on the scientific phenomena presented.

Keywords

Scientific Creativity; Project Based Learning; Physics Learning

Full Text:

PDF (English)

References

Abaniel, A. (2021). Enhanced Conceptual Understanding, 21st Century Skills and Learning Attitudes through an Open Inquiry Learning Model in Physics. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 11(1), 30-43.

Yurt, E. (2023). 21st-century skills as predictors of pre-service teachers' professional qualifications: A cross-sectional study. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 11(5), 1328-1345.

Muhali, M. (2019). Pembelajaran inovatif abad ke-21. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengkajian Ilmu Pendidikan: E-Saintika, 3(2), 25-50.

Rahayu, R., Iskandar, S., & Abidin, Y. (2022). Inovasi pembelajaran abad 21 dan penerapannya di Indonesia. Jurnal Basicedu, 6(2), 2099-2104.

Fung, C. H., Poon, K. K., & Ng, S. P. (2022). Fostering student teachers’ 21st century skills by using flipped learning by teaching in STEM education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(12), em2204.

Muhammad, A. E. (2019). The 21st century learning as a knowledge age: The effects on teacher’s transforming teacher’s knowledge in technology-rich environment in social studies education. Journal of Critical Reviews, 7(7), 2020.

Dwivedi, V. J., & Joshi, Y. C. (2020). Leadership Pivotal to Productivity Enhancement for 21st-Century Indian Higher Education System. International Journal of Higher Education, 9(2), 126-143.

Hanicza, Y., Putri, D. H., & Hamdani, D. (2021). Identification of debriefing 21 st century skills on aspects of critical thinking skills and communication skills in Bengkulu high school students in physics subjects. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1731, No. 1, p. 012069). IOP Publishing.

Wibowo, F. C. (2023). Effects of Augmented Reality Integration (ARI) Based Model Physics Independent Learning (MPIL) for Facilitating 21st-Century Skills (21-Cs). Journal of Technology and Science Education, 13(1), 178-192.

Yulianti, D., Sugianto, S., & Ngafidin, K. M. (2022). Scratch assisted physics learning with a STEM approach in the pandemic era to develop 21st century learning skills. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 11(1), 185-194.

Chin, M. K., & Siew, N. M. (2015). The development and validation of a figural scientific creativity test for preschool pupils. Creative Education, 6(12), 1391.

Kurniawati, F., Saleh, A. Y., & Safitri, S. (2022). How to foster students’ creativity? The effects of teacher subjective well-being mediation on the intellectual humility. Cakrawala Pendidikan: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, 41(1), 31-42.

Park, J., Yoon, H. G., & Lee, I. (2023). Based Teaching: Analyzing Science Teachers' Process of Understanding and Using Academic Papers to Teach Scientific Creativity. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 22(1), 57-72.

Jatmiko, B., Hariyono, E., Lestari, N. A., & Prahani, B. K. (2021, March). MobLen Model for Enhancing Scientific Creativity of Physics Students: An Alternative in the Covid-19 Pandemic. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1805, No. 1, p. 012006). IOP Publishing.

Dewantara, D., Mahtari, S., Nur, M., Yuanita, L., & Sunarti, T. (2020). The Correlation of Scientific Knowledge-Science Process Skills and Scientific Creativity in Creative Responsibility Based Learning. International Journal of Instruction, 13(3), 307-316.

PISA 2022 Results (Volume I and II) - Country Notes: Indonesia | OECD. (n.d.).

Suprayitno, T. (2019). Pendidikan di Indonesia: belajar dari hasil PISA 2018.

Hu, W., & Adey, P. (2002). A scientific creativity test for secondary school students. International Journal of Science Education, 24(4), 389-403.

Altiparmak, T., & Eryilmaz-Mustu, Ö. (2021). The Effects of SCAMPER Technique Activities in the 8th Grade Simple Machines Unit on Students' Academic Achievement, Motivation and Attitude towards Science Lessons. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 7(1), 155-170.

Hu, W., Wu, B., Jia, X., Yi, X., Duan, C., Meyer, W., & Kaufman, J. C. (2013). Increasing students' scientific creativity: The “learn to think” intervention program. The journal of creative behavior, 47(1), 3-21.

Belda-Medina, J. (2022). Promoting inclusiveness, creativity and critical thinking through digital storytelling among EFL teacher candidates. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 26(2), 109-123.

Puente-Díaz, R. (2023). Metacognitive feelings as a source of information for the creative process: A conceptual exploration. Journal of Intelligence, 11(3), 49.

Fatonah, S., Prasetyo, Z. K., Utami, A. D., Chasanah, U., Lusiana, L., & Siregar, V. V. (2024). Scientific Attitude and Its Effect on Students’ Productivity. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 12(4).

Taşdemir, C. Y. (2021). Is Scientific Creativity Possible in Early Childhood?. Theory and Practice in Child Development, 1(1), 71-82.

Ismuwardani, Z., Nuryatin, A., & Doyin, M. (2019). Implementation of project based learning model to increased creativity and self-reliance of students on poetry writing skills. Journal of Primary Education, 8(1), 51-58.

Wijayati, N., Sumarni, W., & Supanti, S. (2019). Improving student creative thinking skills through project based learning. KnE Social Sciences, 408-421.

Prajoko, S., Sukmawati, I., Maris, A. F., & Wulanjani, A. N. (2023). Project based learning (pjbl) model with stem approach on students’ conceptual understanding and creativity. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 12(3), 401-409.

Arzak, K. A., & Prahani, B. K. (2023). Practicality of Augmented Reality Books in Physics Learning: A Literature Review. JPPS (Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Sains), 12(2), 138-154.

Prahani, B. K., Suprapto, N., Rachmadiarti, F., Sholahuddin, A., Mahtari, S., & Siswanto, J. (2021). Online Scientific Creativity Learning (OSCL) in Science Education to Improve Students' Scientific Creativity in COVID-19 Pandemic. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 18, 77-90.

Santyasa, I. W., Rapi, N. K., & Sara, I. (2020). Project based learning and academic procrastination of students in learning physics. International Journal of instruction, 13(1), 489-508.

Nainggolan, B., Hutabarat, W., Situmorang, M., & Sitorus, M. (2020). Developing Innovative Chemistry Laboratory Workbook Integrated with Project-Based Learning and Character-Based Chemistry. International Journal of Instruction, 13(3), 895-908.

Khoiri, N., Ristanto, S., & Kurniawan, A. F. (2023). Project-based learning via traditional game in physics learning: Its impact on critical thinking, creative thinking, and collaborative skills. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 12(2), 286-292.

Siagan, M. V., Saragih, S., & Sinaga, B. (2019). Development of Learning Materials Oriented on Problem-Based Learning Model to Improve Students' Mathematical Problem Solving Ability and Metacognition Ability. International electronic journal of mathematics education, 14(2), 331-340.

Bars, M. (2022). Adaptation of Metacognition in Mathematics Scale to Turkish: A Validity and Reliability Study. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 14(3).

Jua, S. K. (2018, May). The profile of students’ problem-solving skill in physics across interest program in the secondary school. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1022, No. 1, p. 012027). IOP Publishing.

Borich, G. D. (1974). An Evaluation of the Personalized Model of Teacher Training. Final Report.

Zalat, M. M., Hamed, M. S., & Bolbol, S. A. (2021). The experiences, challenges, and acceptance of e-learning as a tool for teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic among university medical staff. PloS one, 16(3), e0248758.

Napitupulu, D., Simarmata, J., Abdillah, L. A., Setiawan, M. I., Ahmar, A. S., Rahim, R., ... & Erliana, C. I. (2017, November). Analysis of technology acceptance model (TAM) on e-learning system. In 2017 International Conference on Education and Technology (2017 ICEduTech) (pp. 247-251). Atlantis Press.

Sumo, M., Jatmiko, B., Supardi, Z. A. I., & Suprianto, S. (2024). The Influence Of The Project-Based Learning Model On The Scientific Creativity Of Physics Education Undergraduate Students At Madura Islamic University. SEJ (Science Education Journal), 8(1), 19-31.

Arends, R. (2004). Guide to Field Experiences and Portfolio Development to Accompany Learning to Teach, Sixth Editon (Vol. 2). McGraw-Hill.

Santoso, A. M., Primandiri, P. R., Zubaidah, S., & Amin, M. (2021, March). The development of students’ worksheets using project based learning (PjBL) in improving higher order thinking skills (HOTs) and time management skills of students. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1806, No. 1, p. 012173). IOP Publishing.

Nizam, N., & Partiwi, S. G. (2023). Panduan Implementasi Pembelajaran Berpusat Pada Mahasiswa.

Wahyuni, L., & Rahayu, Y. S. (2021). Pengembangan e-book berbasis project based learning (pjbl) untuk melatihkan kemampuan berpikir kreatif pada materi pertumbuhan dan perkembangan tumbuhan kelas xii sma. Berkala Ilmiah Pendidikan Biologi (BioEdu), 10(2), 314-325.

de Vries, H. B., & Lubart, T. I. (2019). Scientific creativity: divergent and convergent thinking and the impact of culture. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 53(2), 145-155.

Ananda, L. R., Rahmawati, Y., & Khairi, F. (2023). Critical Thinking Skills of Chemistry Students by Integrating Design Thinking with STEAM-PjBL. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 13(1), 352-367.

Kusumaningtyas, D. I. (2022). Keterampilan abad 21 dalam model-model pembelajaran berpendekatan STEAM pada RPP tematik SD. JRPD (Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Dasar), 5(1), 74-81.

Suradika, A., Dewi, H. I., & Nasution, M. I. (2023). Project-based learning and problem-based learning models in critical and creative students. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 12(1), 153-167.

Prahani, B. K., Susiawati, E., Deta, U. A., Lestari, N. A., Yantidewi, M., Jauhariyah, M. N. R., ... & Siswanto, J. (2021, February). Profile of students’ physics problem-solving skills and the implementation of inquiry (free, guided, and structured) learning in senior high school. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1747, No. 1, p. 012012). IOP Publishing.

Nur, M., Yuanita, L., Prahani, B. K., & Jatmiko, B. (2018). Effectiveness of Creative Responsibility Based Teaching (CRBT) Model on Basic Physics Learning to Increase Student's Scientific Creativity and Responsibility. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 17(1), 136-151.

Moreno, F. E., & Díaz, M. R. (2021, October). Learning electrical circuits for the development of critical thinking. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 2073, No. 1, p. 012001). IOP Publishing.

Setemen, K., Sudirtha, I. G., & Widiana, I. W. (2023). The Effectiveness of Study, Explore, Implement, Evaluate E-Learning Model Based on Project-Based Learning on the Students Conceptual Understanding and Learning Agility. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 13(3), 583-596.

Putri, S. U., Sumiati, T., & Larasati, I. (2019, February). Improving creative thinking skill through project-based-learning in science for primary school. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1157, No. 2, p. 022052). IOP Publishing.

Dolmans, D. H. (2019). How theory and design-based research can mature PBL practice and research. Advances in health sciences education, 24(5), 879-891.

Siagian, A. F., Ibrahim, M., & Supardi, Z. A. I. (2023). Creative-scientific decision-making skills learning model for training creative thinking skills and student decision making skills. Nurture, 17(1), 10-17.

Siew, N. M., & Ambo, N. (2020). The Scientific Creativity of Fifth Graders in a STEM Project-Based Cooperative Learning Approach. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 78(4), 627-643.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26737/jipf.v9i3.5802