Computational-Thinking Based Learning Activities for Physics in Indonesian New Curriculum Through a Student Worksheet Development

Siti Nur Rahmawati; Ahmad Fauzi; Supurwoko Supurwoko

doi:10.26737/jipf.v9i3.4807

Computational-Thinking Based Learning Activities for Physics in Indonesian New Curriculum Through a Student Worksheet Development

Siti Nur Rahmawati, Ahmad Fauzi, Supurwoko Supurwoko

Abstract

This research aims to investigate the practicality of the CT-based learning integrated in the physics high school subject through a development of student worksheet. The CT-based learning adapted from Palts and Pedaste’s problem-solving cycle for CT and involved Weintrop’s taxonomy of CT activities in math and science as the reference activities. The study used Plomp’s model, started from the preliminary research, followed by the development phase and evaluation that contained the validity content and practicality evaluation. The content showed high validity scores thus it was continued with the practicality evaluation by carrying out a micro-evaluation to the target users that involved observation, interview, and questionnaire addressing. The evaluation showed that the learning activities through the student worksheet had high practicality scores thus it is possible to be used and adapted to other subject matters.

Keywords

Computational Thinking; Independent Curriculum; Student Worksheets; Unplugged; Physics

Full Text:

PDF (English)

References

Stoilescu, D. (2019). Exploring the Introduction of Computational Thinking in STEM Education in Australian Schools. Southeast Asian Mathematics Education Journal, 9(1), 17-24.

Palts, T., & Pedaste, M. (2020). A model for developing computational thinking skills. Informatics in Education, 19(1), 113-128.

Bocconi, S., Chioccariello, A., Dettori, G., Ferrari, A., & Engelhardt, K. (2016). Developing computational thinking in compulsory education-Implications for policy and practice (No. JRC104188). Joint Research Centre (Seville site).

So, H. J., Jong, M. S. Y., & Liu, C. C. (2020). Computational thinking education in the Asian Pacific region. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 29, 1-8.

Lodi, M., & Martini, S. (2021). Computational thinking, between Papert and Wing. Science & education, 30(4), 883-908.

Mohaghegh, D. M., & McCauley, M. (2016). Computational thinking: The skill set of the 21st century. (IJCSIT) International Journal of Computer Science and Information Technologies, 7(3), 1524-1530.

Azman, S. M. S., Arsat, M., & Mohamed, H. (2017, December). The framework for the integration of computational thinking in ideation process. In 2017 IEEE 6th International Conference on Teaching, Assessment, and Learning for Engineering (TALE) (pp. 61-65). IEEE.

Pratiwi, W. D. (2021). Dinamika learning loss: Guru dan orang Tua. Jurnal Edukasi Nonformal, 2(1), 147-153.

Wing, J. M. (2014). Computational thinking benefits society. 40th anniversary blog of social issues in computing, 2014, 26.

Pertiwi, A., Syukur, A., Suhartini, T., & Affandy, A. (2020). Konsep informatika dan computational thinking di dalam kurikulum sekolah dasar, menengah, dan atas. Abdimasku: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat, 3(3), 146-155.

Maharani, S., Nusantara, T., As’ari, A. R., & Qohar, A. (2020). Computational thinking pemecahan masalah di abad ke-21. Madiun: Perpustakan Nasional: Katalog Dalam Terbitan (KDT).

Zahid, M. Z. (2020, March). Telaah kerangka kerja PISA 2021: era integrasi computational thinking dalam bidang matematika. In PRISMA, Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika (Vol. 3, pp. 706-713).

Maharani, S., Nusantara, T., As’ari, A. R., & Qohar, A. (2020). Computational thinking pemecahan masalah di abad ke-21. Madiun: Perpustakan Nasional: Katalog Dalam Terbitan (KDT).

Maharani, A. (2020). Computational thinking dalam pembelajaran matematika menghadapi Era Society 5.0. Euclid, 7(2), 86-96.

Maharani, S., Nusantara, T., As’ari, A. R., & Qohar, A. (2020). Computational thinking: Media pembelajaran CSK (CT-Sheet for Kids) dalam matematika PAUD. Jurnal Obsesi: Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, 5(1), 975-984.

Widiningrum, W. N., Hardyanto, W., Wahyuni, S., Marwoto, P., & Mindyarto, B. N. (2021). Meta-Analisis media scratch terhadap keterampilan computational thinking siswa SMA dalam pembelajaran fisika. Jurnal Riset dan Kajian Pendidikan Fisika e-ISSN, 8(1), 1-8.

Muliyati, D., Tanmalaka, A. S., Ambarwulan, D., Kirana, D., & Permana, H. (2020, April). Train the computational thinking skill using problem-based learning worksheet for undergraduate physics student in computational physics courses. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1521, No. 2, p. 022024). IOP Publishing.

Pasani, C. F., Amelia, R., & Hassan, Z. (2021). Learning loss and education inequality in Indonesia (mapping the potential, consequences, and the COVID-19 crisis). Rigeo, 11(10).

Donnelly, R., & Patrinos, H. A. (2022). Learning loss during Covid-19: An early systematic review. Prospects, 51(4), 601-609.

Kemdikbud. (2022). Kurikulum Merdeka. Sistem Informasi Kurikulum Nasional; Pusat Kurikulum dan Pembelajaran.

Rejeki, N. (2022). Analisis learning loss dan strategi recovery pasca pembelajaran jarak jauh. Nusantara: Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 2(3), 407-422.

Tedre, M., & Denning, P. J. (2016, November). The long quest for computational thinking. In Proceedings of the 16th Koli Calling international conference on computing education research (pp. 120-129).

Plomp, T., & Nieveen, N. (2013). Educational design research part A: An introduction. Enchede: SLO.

Adriani, D., Azhar, M., Dj, L., & Putra, A. (2021, February). Validity and practicality level of acid-base electronic module based on structured inquiry containing three levels of chemical representation for senior high school student. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1788, No. 1, p. 012038). IOP Publishing.

Weintrop, D., Beheshti, E., Horn, M., Orton, K., Jona, K., Trouille, L., & Wilensky, U. (2016). Defining computational thinking for mathematics and science classrooms. Journal of science education and technology, 25, 127-147.

Caeli, E. N., & Yadav, A. (2020). Unplugged approaches to computational thinking: A historical perspective. TechTrends, 64(1), 29-36.

Aranda, G., & Ferguson, J. P. (2018). Unplugged Programming: The future of teaching computational thinking?. Pedagogika, 68(3).

Grover, S., & Pea, R. (2013). Computational thinking in K–12: A review of the state of the field. Educational researcher, 42(1), 38-43.

Maulida, U. (2022). Pengembangan modul ajar berbasis kurikulum merdeka. Tarbawi, 5(2), 130-138.

Srinivasa, K. G., Kurni, M., & Saritha, K. (2022). Learning, Teaching, and Assessment Methods for Contemporary Learners (pp. 1-15). Singapore: Springer.

Gopalan, V., Bakar, J. A. A., Zulkifli, A. N., Alwi, A., & Mat, R. C. (2017, October). A review of the motivation theories in learning. In Aip conference proceedings (Vol. 1891, No. 1). AIP Publishing.

Pérez-Juárez, M. Á., González-Ortega, D., & Aguiar-Pérez, J. M. (2023). Digital distractions from the point of view of higher education students. Sustainability, 15(7), 6044.

Haith, A. M., & Krakauer, J. W. (2018). The multiple effects of practice: skill, habit and reduced cognitive load. Current opinion in behavioral sciences, 20, 196-201.

Sutiyatno, S. (2018). The effect of teacher’s verbal communication and non-verbal communication on students’ English achievement. Journal of language teaching and research, 9(2), 430-437.

Sutherland, T. M. (1976). The lecture method. NACTA Journal, 20(3), 29-33.

Majid, A. (2013). Strategi Pembelajaran. PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26737/jipf.v9i3.4807