The Effect of STEM Integrated Inquiry Models in Improving Student Science Learning Outcomes (A Meta-Analysis)

Muhammad Dhanil; Fatni Mufit; Asrizal Asrizal; Fina Afriani Putri

doi:10.26737/jipf.v9i2.4488

The Effect of STEM Integrated Inquiry Models in Improving Student Science Learning Outcomes (A Meta-Analysis)

Muhammad Dhanil, Fatni Mufit, Asrizal Asrizal, Fina Afriani Putri

Abstract

21st-century learning emphasizes the mastery of knowledge as a whole through the investigation of several points of view of knowledge, one of which is inquiry and STEM models. This study aims to determine the magnitude of the size of 20 studies on the effect of STEM-integrated inquiry models on science learning and learning outcomes. The moderator variables considered are education level and type of publication. The analyzed studies were obtained from Google Scholar and ERIC databases between 2013 and 2023. The results of the analysis showed that the influence of the STEM integrated inquiry model in physics learning on student learning outcomes had an average effect size value of 0.78 which was included in the medium category, based on 20 studies that had been collected. The distribution of studies discussing STEM-integrated inquiry models was most found in 2020 and international journals. The influence of STEM looks different at each level of education, with a significant dominance of influence occurring at the high school level.

Keywords

Meta-Analysis; Inquiry Model; STEM

Full Text:

PDF (English)

References

Buckingham Shum, S., & Crick, R. D. (2016). Learning Analytics for 21st Century Competencies. Journal of Learning Analytics, 3(2), 6-21.

González-Pérez, L. I., & Ramírez-Montoya, M. S. (2022). Components of Education 4.0 in 21st century skills frameworks: systematic review. Sustainability, 14(3), 1493.

Dhanil, M., & Mufit, F. (2021). Design and Validity of Interactive Multimedia Based on Cognitive Conflict on Static Fluid Using Adobe Animate CC 2019. Jurnal Penelitian & Pengembangan Pendidikan Fisika, 7(2), 177-190.

Mufit, F., & Fauzan, A. (2023). The Effect of Cognitive Conflict-Based Learning (CCBL) Model on Remediation of Misconceptions. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 20(1), 26-49.

Mufit, F., Asrizal, A., & Puspitasari, R. (2022). Cognitive Conflict-Based E-Book with Real Experiment Video Analysis Integration to Enhance Conceptual Understanding of Motion Kinematics. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 11(4), 626-639.

Vaidya, S., Ambad, P., & Bhosle, S. (2018). Industry 4.0–a glimpse. Procedia manufacturing, 20, 233-238.

Rani, S. A., & Dwandaru, W. S. B. (2019, October). Physics virtual laboratory: An innovative media in 21st century learning. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1321, No. 2, p. 022026). IOP Publishing.

Tang, C. (2022). Physics of Life. In A Festschrift in Honor of the CN Yang Centenary: Scientific Papers (pp. 345-350).

Chalmers, A. (2013). What is this thing called science?. McGraw-Hill Education (UK).

Fogarty, R. J., & Pete, B. M. (2009). How to integrate the curricula. Corwin Press.

Grant, S. G., Swan, K., & Lee, J. (2022). Inquiry-based practice in social studies education: Understanding the inquiry design model. Routledge.

Schultz-Jones, B., & Oberg, D. (Eds.). (2022). Global action for school libraries: Models of inquiry (Vol. 182). Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG.

Al Hidayah, L. F., & Nurita, T. (2022). The effect of the structured inquiry learning model on students' critical and collaborative thinking skills. Jurnal Pijar Mipa, 17(3), 369-374.

Prastowo, A. (2013). Pengembangan bahan ajar tematik. Diva Press.

Chen, K., & Chen, C. (2021). Effects of STEM Inquiry Method on Learning Attitude and Creativity. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(11).

Sukma, M., Halim, A., & Evendi, E. (2022). Implementation of e-Learning Module Based on Science Technology Engineering Mathematics on Solar Cells Topic. JIPF (Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Fisika), 7(1), 60-70.

Alatas, F., & Yakin, N. A. (2021). The Effect of Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Learning on Students’ Problem Solving Skill. JIPF (Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Fisika), 6(1), 1-9.

Fadlina, F., Artika, W., Khairil, K., Nurmaliah, C., & Abdullah, A. (2021). Penerapan model discovery learning berbasis STEM pada materi sistem gerak untuk meningkatkan keterampilan berpikir kritis. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia (Indonesian Journal of Science Education), 9(1), 99-107.

Drake, S., & Burns, R. (2004). Meeting standards through integrated curriculum. ASCD.

Saefullah, A., Suherman, A., Utami, R. T., Antarnusa, G., Rostikawati, D. A., & Zidny, R. (2021). Implementation of PjBL-STEM to Improve students' creative thinking skills on static fluid topic. JIPF (Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Fisika), 6(2), 149-157.

Maj, S. P. (2022). A practical new 21st century learning theory for significantly improving STEM learning outcomes at all educational levels. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(2), em2073.

Nasir, M., Cari, C., Sunarno, W., & Rahmawati, F. (2022). The effect of STEM-based guided inquiry on light concept understanding and scientific explanation. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(11), em2175.

Isdianti, M., Nasrudin, H., & Erman, E. (2021). The effectiveness of STEM based inquiry learning packages to improving students’ critical thinking skill. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 9(3), 223-232.

Thahir, A., Anwar, C., Saregar, A., Choiriah, L., Susanti, F., & Pricilia, A. (2020, February). The Effectiveness of STEM learning: scientific attitudes and students’ conceptual understanding. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1467, No. 1, p. 012008). IOP Publishing.

Garzón, J., & Acevedo, J. (2019). Meta-analysis of the impact of Augmented Reality on students’ learning gains. Educational Research Review, 27, 244-260.

Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P., & Rothstein, H. R. (2021). Introduction to meta-analysis. John Wiley & Sons.

Tawfik, G. M., Dila, K. A. S., Mohamed, M. Y. F., Tam, D. N. H., Kien, N. D., Ahmed, A. M., & Huy, N. T. (2019). A step by step guide for conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis with simulation data. Tropical medicine and health, 47, 1-9.

Primer, A. P. (1992). Quantitative methods in psychology. Psychological bulletin, 112(1,155-159).

Sawilowsky, S. S. (2009). New effect size rules of thumb. Journal of modern applied statistical methods, 8, 597-599.

Hudha, M. N., Batlolona, J. R., & Wartono, W. (2019, December). Science literation ability and physics concept understanding in the topic of work and energy with inquiry-STEM. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 2202, No. 1). AIP Publishing.

Sastradika, D. (2018, September). Development of subject-specific pedagogy based on guided inquiry about newton’s law to improve senior high school students’ scientific literacy ability. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1097, No. 1, p. 012017). IOP Publishing.

Yılmaz, A., & Yanarateş, E. (2022). The effect of STEM activities developed within the scope of a science course on 7th grade students' inquiry and innovative thinking skills: The effect of STEM activities. International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 14(1), 274-303.

Wastiti, L., & Sulur, S. (2020). Pengaruh STEM-thinking maps pada model pembelajaran inkuiri terbimbing terhadap kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa kelas XI pada materi suhu dan kalor. JRPF (Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Fisika), 4(2), 110-115.

Mutowiah, N., Supriana, E., & Sutopo, S. (2020). Pengaruh pembelajaran inkuiri terintegrasi STEM terhadap kemampuan kreativitas siswa. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Fisika, 5(2), 125-128.

Uğur, S. A. R. I., Duygu, E., ŞEN, Ö. F., & Kirindi, T. (2020). The effects of STEM education on scientific process skills and STEM awareness in simulation based inquiry learning environment. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 17(3), 387-405.

Islamyah, D. G., Yasa, P., & Rachmawati, D. O. (2018). Penerapan model pembelajaran inkuiri terbimbing berbasis STEM guna meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa kelas X MIPA 4 SMAN tahun ajaran 2018/2019. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Undiksha, 8(2), 86-94.

Ong, E. T., Luo, X., Yuan, J., & Yingprayoon, J. (2020). The Effectiveness of a Professional Development Program on the Use of STEM-Based 5E Inquiry Learning Model for Science Teachers in China. Science Education International, 31(2), 179-184.

Pahrudin, A., Alisia, G., Saregar, A., Asyhari, A., Anugrah, A., & Susilowati, N. E. (2021). The Effectiveness of Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Inquiry Learning for 15-16 Years Old Students Based on K-13 Indonesian Curriculum: The Impact on the Critical Thinking Skills. European Journal of Educational Research, 10(2), 681-692.

Bakirci, H., Kirici, M. G., & Kara, Y. (2022). The Effectiveness of STEM-Supported Inquiry-Based Learning Approach on Conceptual Understanding of 7th Graders: Force and Energy Unit. Journal of Science Learning, 5(3), 452-468.

Kırıcı, M. G., & Bakırcı, H. (2021). The effect of STEM supported research-inquiry-based learning approach on the scientific creativity of 7th grade students. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 5(2), 19-35.

Ananda, Y. Y., Nazriati, N., & Dasna, I. W. (2021, March). Inquiry learning with a STEM approach to increase critical thinking skills in terms of students’ initial abilities. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 2330, No. 1). AIP Publishing.

Lin, K. Y., Hsiao, H. S., Williams, P. J., & Chen, Y. H. (2020). Effects of 6E-oriented STEM practical activities in cultivating middle school students’ attitudes toward technology and technological inquiry ability. Research in Science & Technological Education, 38(1), 1-18.

Kahar, M. S., Susilo, S., Abdullah, D., & Oktaviany, V. (2022). The effectiveness of the integrated inquiry guided model STEM on students scientific literacy abilities. International Journal of Nonlinear Analysis and Applications, 13(1), 1667-1672.

Gultom, F. K. B. (2019). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Inquiry Training Dengan Pendekatan Stem Pada Materi Fisika Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Siswa Kelas XI SMAN 18 Medan (Doctoral dissertation, UNIMED).

Paramita, A. K., & Yahmin, I. Pembelajaran Inkuiri Terbimbing dengan Pendekatan STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics) untuk Pemahaman Konsep dan Keterampilan Argumentasi Siswa SMA pada Materi Laju Reaksi. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan, 5(11), 1652-1663.

Zahara, R., & Syukri, M. (2020, February). Promoting inquiry-based learning for science, technology, engineering, math (STEM) to enhance students’ creative thinking skills. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1460, No. 1, p. 012120). IOP Publishing.

Saraç, H. (2018). The Effect of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics-STEM Educational Practices on Students' Learning Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis Study. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 17(2), 125-142.

Kanadli, S. (2019). A meta-summary of qualitative findings about STEM education. International Journal of Instruction, 12(1), 959-976.

Kazu, I. Y., & Kurtoglu Yalcin, C. (2021). The effect of stem education on academic performance: A meta-analysis study. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 20(4), 101-116.

Putri, R. M., Asrizal, A., & Usmeldi, U. (2022). Metaanalisis efek pendekatan STEM pada literasi sains dan pemahaman konsep peserta didik di setiap satuan pendidikan. JIPI (Jurnal IPA dan Pembelajaran IPA), 6(1), 86-98.

Abdi, M. U., Mustafa, M., & Pada, A. U. T. (2021). Penerapan pendekatan STEM berbasis simulasi PhET untuk meningkatkan pemahaman konsep fisika peserta didik. JIPI (Jurnal IPA dan Pembelajaran IPA), 5(3), 209-218.

Putri, C. D., Pursitasari, I. D., & Rubini, B. (2020). Problem based learning terintegrasi STEM di era pandemi covid-19 untuk meningkatkan keterampilan berpikir kritis siswa. JIPI (Jurnal IPA dan Pembelajaran IPA), 4(2), 193-204.

Yanti, N. S., Yusrizal, Y., & Gani, A. (2016). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Inkuiri Terbimbing Untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Berpikir Kreatif dan Motivasi Siswa Ditinjau dari Jenis Kelamin Pada Materi Kalor Kelas X SMAN 11 Banda Aceh. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia (Indonesian Journal of Science Education), 4(1).

Nugroho, B., & Zulfiani, Z. (2021). A Causal-Comparative Study of Inquiry-Based Science Learning Based on Levels of Students' Cognitive Learning Outcomes: Systematic Review. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia (Indonesian Journal of Science Education), 9(4), 655-670.

Astuti, W., Sulastri, S., Syukri, M., & Halim, A. (2023). Implementasi pendekatan science, technology, engineering, and mathematics untuk meningkatkan kemampuan literasi sains dan kreativitas siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia (Indonesian Journal of Science Education), 11(1), 25-39.

Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P., & Rothstein, H. R. (2010). A basic introduction to fixed‐effect and random‐effects models for meta‐analysis. Research synthesis methods, 1(2), 97-111.

Egger, M., Smith, G. D., Schneider, M., & Minder, C. (1997). Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. bmj, 315(7109), 629-634.

Lin, K. (2017, October). New paradigm or old wine? The development of STEM education and maker movement in technology education in Taiwan. In TENZ (Technology Education New Zealand)–ICTE (Asia-Pacific) Conference (pp. 1-5).

Rosenthal, R. (1979). The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. Psychological bulletin, 86(3), 638.

Asrizal, A., Dhanil, M., & Usmeldi, U. (2023). The Effect of STEAM on Science Learning on Student Learning Achievement: A Meta-Analysis. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(4), 1650-1657.

Wang, L. H., Chen, B., Hwang, G. J., Guan, J. Q., & Wang, Y. Q. (2022). Effects of digital game-based STEM education on students’ learning achievement: a meta-analysis. International Journal of STEM Education, 9(1), 26.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26737/jipf.v9i2.4488