Using Rasch Model to Analyze Reliability and Validity of Concept Mastery Test on Electricity and Magnetism Topic
Abstract
Keywords
Full Text:
PDF (English)References
Shipstone, D. M. (1984). A study of children's understanding of electricity in simple DC circuits. European journal of science education, 6(2): 185-198.
Shipstone, D. (1988). Pupils' understanding of simple electrical circuits. Some implications for instruction. Physics education, 23(2): 92.
Arnold, M., & Millar, R. (1987). Being constructive: An alternative approach to the teaching of introductory ideas in electricity. International Journal of Science Education, 9(5): 553-563.
Osborne, R. J., & Cosgrove, M. M. (1983). Children's conceptions of the changes of state of water. Journal of research in Science Teaching, 20(9): 825-838.
Osborne, R. (1983). Towards modifying children's ideas about electric current. Research in Science & Technological Education, 1(1): 73-82.
Hekkenberg, A., Lemmer, M., & Dekkers, P. (2015). An analysis of teachers' concept confusion concerning electric and magnetic fields. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(1): 34-44.
Tarciso Borges, A., & Gilbert, J. K. (1999). Mental models of electricity. International journal of science education, 21(1): 95-117.
Cosgrove, M. (1995). A study of science‐in‐the‐making as students generate an analogy for electricity. International journal of science education, 17(3): 295-310.
Cohen, R., Eylon, B., & Ganiel, U. (1983). Potential difference and current in simple electric circuits: A study of students’ concepts. American journal of Physics, 51(5): 407-412.
Paatz, R., Ryder, J., Schwedes, H., & Scott, P. (2004). A case study analysing the process of analogy‐based learning in a teaching unit about simple electric circuits. International Journal of Science Education, 26(9): 1065-1081.
Psillos, D., Koumaras, P., & Valassiades, O. (1987). Pupils’ representations of electric current before, during and after instruction on DC circuits. Research in Science & Technological Education, 5(2): 185-199.
Engelhardt, P. V., & Beichner, R. J. (2004). Students’ understanding of direct current resistive electrical circuits. American journal of physics, 72(1): 98-115.
Finkelstein, N. (2005). Learning physics in context: A study of student learning about electricity and magnetism. International Journal of Science Education, 27(10): 1187-1209.
Zacharia, Z. C., & De Jong, T. (2014). The effects on students’ conceptual understanding of electric circuits of introducing virtual manipulatives within a physical manipulatives-oriented curriculum. Cognition and instruction, 32(2): 101-158.
Stocklmayer, S. M., & Treagust, D. F. (1996). Images of electricity: How do novices and experts model electric current?. International Journal of Science Education, 18(2): 163-178.
Heller, P. M., & Finley, F. N. (1992). Variable uses of alternative conceptions: A case study in current electricity. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(3): 259-275.
Heywood, D., & Parker, J. (1997). Confronting the analogy: primary teachers exploring the usefulness of analogies in the teaching and learning of electricity. International Journal of Science Education, 19(8): 869-885.
Dega, B. G., Kriek, J., & Mogese, T. F. (2013). Students' conceptual change in electricity and magnetism using simulations: A comparison of cognitive perturbation and cognitive conflict. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(6): 677-698.
Tiruneh, D. T., De Cock, M., Weldeslassie, A. G., Elen, J., & Janssen, R. (2017). Measuring critical thinking in physics: Development and validation of a critical thinking test in electricity and magnetism. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15(4): 663-682.
Groundlund, R. L., & Linn, N.E. (1990). Measurement and Evaluation in Teaching. Prentice Hall College Div.
Thorndike, R. L. (1971). Educational Measurement, Second Ed. American Council on Education.
Aydın, U., & Ubuz, B. (2015). The thinking-about-derivative test for undergraduate students: development and validation. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(6): 1279-1303.
Haladyna, T. M. (2004). Developing and Validating Multiple-Choice Test Items. Routledge.
Haladyna, T. M., Downing, S. M., & Rodriguez, M. C. (2002). A review of multiple-choice item-writing guidelines for classroom assessment. Applied measurement in education, 15(3): 309-333.
Haladyna, T. M., & Rodriguez, M. C. (2013). Developing and Validating Test. Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.
Groundlund, N. E. (1982). Constructing Achievement Test, Third Ed. Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Groundlund, N. E. (2003). Assessment of Student Achievement, Seventh Ed. Pearson Education, Inc.
Gall, M. D., Borg, W. R., & Gall, J. P. (1996). Educational research: An introduction. Longman Publishing.
Russell, M. K., Airasian, P. W. (1967). Classroom Assessment: Concepts and Applications, 7th ed. McGraw-Hill Companies.
Mehrens, W. A. & Lehmann, I. J. (1991). Measurement and Evaluation in Education and Psychology, Fourth Ed. Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.
Skorupiński, P. M. (2015). American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, National Council on Measurement in Education, Standards for educational and psychological testing. Kwartalnik Pedagogiczny, 238(4): 201-203.
Susongko, P. (2016). Validation of science achievement test with the rasch model. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 5(2): 268-277.
Retnawati, H. (2016). Validitas, Reliabilitas, & Karakteristik Butir (Panduan untuk Peneliti, Mahasiswa, dan Psikometrian). Parama Publishing.
Hambleton, R. K. & Swaminatan, H. (1985). Item Response Theory: Principles and Applications. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC.
Hambleton, R. K., Swaminatan, H., & Rogers, H. J. (1991). Fundamentals of Item Respons Theory. Sage Publication, Inc..
Demars, C. (2010). Item Respons Theory: Understanding Statistics Measurement. Oxford University Press.
Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2001). Applying the Rasch Model: Fundamental Measurement in the Human Sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2015). Applying the Rasch Model: Fundamental Measurement in the Human Science, Third Edit. Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.
Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2007). Applying the Rasch Model: Fundamental Measurement in the Human Sciences, Second Edi. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Boone, W. J. (2016). Rasch analysis for instrument development: Why, when, and how?. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 15(4): 1-7.
Boone, W. J., Staver, J. R., & Yale, M. S. (2014). Rasch Analysis in the Human Sciences. Springer.
Abdaziz, A., Jusoh, M. S., Amlus, H., & Salleh, T. S. (2014). Construct validity: A Rasch measurement model approaches. Journal of Applied Science and Agriculture, 9(12): 7-12.
Cheng, M. M., & Oon, P. T. (2016). Understanding metallic bonding: Structure, process and interaction by Rasch analysis. International Journal of Science Education, 38(12): 1923-1944.
Gänswein, W. (2011). Effectiveness of Information Use for Strategic Decision Making. Gabler.
Luo, T., Wang, J., Liu, X., & Zhou, J. (2019). Development and application of a scale to measure students’ STEM continuing motivation. International Journal of Science Education, 41(14): 1885-1904.
Tabatabaee-Yazdi, M., Motallebzadeh, K., Ashraf, H., & Baghaei, P. (2018). Development and Validation of a Teacher Success Questionnaire Using the Rasch Model. International Journal of Instruction, 11(2): 129-144.
Yang, W., & Liu, E. (2016). Development and validation of an instrument for evaluating inquiry-based tasks in science textbooks. International Journal of Science Education, 38(18): 2688-2711.
Commons, M. L., Goodheart, E. A., Pekker, A., Dawson, T. L., Draney, K., & Adams, K. M. (2008). Using Rasch scaled stage scores to validate orders of hierarchical complexity of balance beam task sequences. Journal of Applied Measurement, 9(2): 182-199.
Fulmer, G. W. (2015). Validating proposed learning progressions on force and motion using the force concept inventory: Findings from Singapore secondary schools. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(6): 1235-1254.
bin Khairani, A. Z., & bin Abd Razak, N. (2012). Advance in educational measurement: A Rasch model analysis of Mathematics proficiency test. International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, 2(3): 248.
Kuo, C. Y., Wu, H. K., Jen, T. H., & Hsu, Y. S. (2015). Development and validation of a multimedia-based assessment of scientific inquiry abilities. International Journal of Science Education, 37(14): 2326-2357.
Van Zile-Tamsen, C. (2017). Using Rasch analysis to inform rating scale development. Research in Higher Education, 58(8): 922-933.
Briggs, A. L., Jackson, T. R., Bruce, S., & Shapiro, N. L. (2005). The development and performance validation of a tool to assess patient anticoagulation knowledge. Research in social and administrative Pharmacy, 1(1): 40-59.
Nielsen, J. B., Kyvsgaard, J. N., Sildorf, S. M., Kreiner, S., & Svensson, J. (2017). Item analysis using Rasch models confirms that the Danish versions of the DISABKIDS® chronic-generic and diabetes-specific modules are valid and reliable. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 15(1): 1-10.
Tran, V. D., Dorofeeva, V. V., & Loskutova, E. E. (2018). Development and validation of a scale to measure the quality of patient medication counseling using rasch model. Pharmacy Practice (Granada), 16(4).
Runnels, J. (2012). Using the Rasch model to validate a multiple choice English achievement test. International Journal of Language Studies, 6(4): 141-155.
Saidi, S. S., & Siew, N. M. (2019). Reliability and Validity Analysis of Statistical Reasoning Test Survey Instrument Using the Rasch Measurement Model. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 14(3): 535-546.
Linacre, J. M. (2002). Optimizing rating scale category effectiveness. Journal of applied measurement, 3(1): 85-106.
Sumintono, B., & Widhiarso, W. (2015). Aplikasi pemodelan rasch pada assessment pendidikan. Trim komunikata.
Sumintono, B., & Widhiarso, W. (2014). Aplikasi model Rasch untuk penelitian ilmu-ilmu sosial (edisi revisi). Trim Komunikata Publishing House.
Boone, W. J., & Scantlebury, K. (2006). The role of Rasch analysis when conducting science education research utilizing multiple‐choice tests. Science Education, 90(2): 253-269.
Davidowitz, B., & Potgieter, M. (2016). Use of the Rasch measurement model to explore the relationship between content knowledge and topic-specific pedagogical content knowledge for organic chemistry. International Journal of Science Education, 38(9): 1483-1503.
Nevin, E., Behan, A., Duffy, G., Farrell, S., Harding, R., Howard, R., ... & Bowe, B. (2015, July). Assessing the validity and reliability of dichotomous test results using Item Response Theory on a group of first year engineering students. In The 6th Research in Engineering Education Symposium (REES 2015), Dublin, Ireland, July (pp. 13-15).
Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. David McKay Company, Inc.
Giancoli, D. C. (2016). Physics Principles With Applications, Global Ed. Pearson.
Serway, R. A., & Jewett, J. W. (2014). Physics for Scientists and Engineers with Modern Physics, Ninth Ed. Brooks/Cole Cengage Learning.
Walker, J., Halliday, D., & Resnick, R. (2014). Fundamental Physics, Tenth Ed. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Rahmawati, R., Rustaman, N. Y., Hamidah, I., & Rusdiana, D. (2018). The development and validation of conceptual knowledge test to evaluate conceptual knowledge of physics prospective teachers on electricity and magnetism topic. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 7(4): 283-490.
Sumintono, B., & Widhiarso, W. (2015). Aplikasi Pemodelan Rasch Pada Asesmen Pendidikan, I. Penerbit Trim Komunikasi.
Krishnan, S., & Idris, N. (2014). Investigating reliability and validity for the construct of inferential statistics. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 4(1): 51-60.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26737/jipf.v8i2.3877
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2023 Rahmawati Rahmawati, Yusri Handayani, Widiasih Widiasih
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Publisher
Institute of Managing and Publishing of Scientific Journals
STKIP Singkawang
Jl. STKIP, Kelurahan Naram, Kecamatan Singkawang Utara, Kota Singkawang, Kalimantan Barat, Indonesia
Website: http://journal.stkipsingkawang.ac.id/index.php/JIPF
Email: [email protected]
JIPF Indexed by:
Copyright (c) JIPF (Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Fisika)
ISSN 2477-8451 (Online) and ISSN 2477-5959 (Print)