Trend and Opportunity of Science Education Research Related Optical Waves: A Systematic Literature Network Analysis

Wahyudi Wahyudi; Agus Setiawan; Andi Suhandi

doi:10.26737/jipf.v8i2.3685

Trend and Opportunity of Science Education Research Related Optical Waves: A Systematic Literature Network Analysis

Wahyudi Wahyudi, Agus Setiawan, Andi Suhandi

Abstract

Understanding the profile or trend of a research topic is very important and is the first step in starting research. The purpose of this study is to describe the profile of science education research related to wave optics learning. The systematic Literature Network Analysis (SLNA) method was used in this study. Article data during the last ten years (2012-2021) was collected from the Google Scholar database using the Publish or Perish (PoP) application. There were 109 eligible articles which were analyzed to find out research trends related to wave optics learning. The analysis results show that the number of studies and research citations has increased in the last ten years. The dominant waves optical materials studied are polarization and diffraction of light. This research is useful in finding further research opportunities related to wave optic learning. Further research related to the application of innovative media and inquiry learning strategies has the opportunity to be developed on wave optics (dispersion and interference). Further research can be focused on conceptual understanding and developing process skills and 21st-century skills for students through wave optics learning.

Keywords

Optical Waves Learning; Science Education; Systematic Literature Network Analysis

Full Text:

PDF (English)

References

Halliday, D., Resnick, R., & Walker, J. (2018). Fundamentals of physics 10th Edition. John Wiley & Sons.

Young, H. D., Freedman, R. A., & Ford, A. L. (2020). University Physics with Modern Physics 15th Edition. Pearson Education.

Serway, R. A., & Jewett, J. W. (2014). Physics for scientists and engineers with Modern Physics 9th Edition. Cengage Learning.

Giancoli, D. C. (2016). Physics Principles with Applications. Pearson Education.

Nie, J., & Zhou, P. (2021, April). Physical optics teaching design under the mode of CDIO education. In 2021 2nd Asia-Pacific Conference on Image Processing, Electronics and Computers (pp. 1139-1143).

Ellianawati, E., & Wahyuni, S. (2010). Pemanfaatan model self regulated learning sebagai upaya peningkatan kemampuan belajar mandiri pada mata kuliah optik. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia, 6(1).

Manrulu, R. H., & Sari, D. N. (2015). Efektivitas kegiatan lesson study dalam merancang pembelajaran pada mata kuliah gelombang dan optik. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika Al-Biruni, 4(2): 231-241.

Wahyudi, Nurhayati, & Saputri, D. F. (2020, November). The Development of Optical Module Based on Science Process Skills. In International Joint Conference on Science and Engineering (IJCSE 2020) (pp. 193-198). Atlantis Press.

Yang, G. J., Wang, B., & Niu, X. L. (2016, January). Research and Practice of Optics Teaching Mode Reform. In 2016 International Forum on Management, Education and Information Technology Application (pp. 489-494). Atlantis Press.

Wosilait, K., Heron, P. R., Shaffer, P. S., & McDermott, L. C. (1999). Addressing student difficulties in applying a wave model to the interference and diffraction of light. American Journal of Physics, 67(S1): S5-S15.

Ozdemir, E., Coramik, M., & Urek, H. (2020). Determination of Conceptual Understanding Levels Related to Optics Concepts: The Case of Opticianry. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 8(1): 53-64.

Wang, W. (2011). Teaching reform of physical optics course. Journal of Anhui University of Technology, 28(4): 110-111.

Xu, L., & Wang, Q. (2016). Exploratory Study on Application of Reflective Teaching in Physical Optics Course. Advance in Education, 6(5): 198-203.

Gough, D., Oliver, S., & Thomas, J. (2012). An Introduction to Systematic Reviews. SAGE.

Kitchenham, B. A., Budgen, D., & Brereton, P. (2015). Evidence-based software engineering and systematic reviews (Vol. 4). CRC press.

Petticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2008). Systematic reviews in the social sciences: A practical guide. John Wiley & Sons.

Newman, M., & Gough, D. (2020). Systematic reviews in educational research: Methodology, perspectives and application. Systematic reviews in educational research: Methodology, perspectives and application: 3-22.

Kunisch, S., Menz, M., Bartunek, J. M., Cardinal, L. B., & Denyer, D. (2018). Feature topic at organizational research methods: how to conduct rigorous and impactful literature reviews?. Organizational Research Methods, 21(3): 519-523.

Linnenluecke, M. K., Marrone, M., & Singh, A. K. (2020). Conducting systematic literature reviews and bibliometric analyses. Australian Journal of Management, 45(2): 175-194.

De Bellis, N. (2009). Bibliometrics and citation analysis: from the science citation index to cybermetrics. scarecrow press.

Duong, Q. H., Zhou, L., Meng, M., Van Nguyen, T., Ieromonachou, P., & Nguyen, D. T. (2022). Understanding product returns: A systematic literature review using machine learning and bibliometric analysis. International Journal of Production Economics, 243: 108340.

Lozada, E., Guerrero-Ortiz, C., Coronel, A., & Medina, R. (2021). Classroom methodologies for teaching and learning ordinary differential equations: A systemic literature review and bibliometric analysis. Mathematics, 9(7): 745.

Khitous, F., Strozzi, F., Urbinati, A., & Alberti, F. (2020). A systematic literature network analysis of existing themes and emerging research trends in circular economy. Sustainability, 12(4): 1633.

Colicchia, C., Creazza, A., Noè, C., & Strozzi, F. (2019). Information sharing in supply chains: a review of risks and opportunities using the systematic literature network analysis (SLNA). Supply chain management: an international journal, 24(1): 5-21.

Jamali, S. M., Md Zain, A. N., Samsudin, M. A., & Ale Ebrahim, N. (2015). Publication Trends in Physics Education: A Bibliometric study. The Journal of Educational Research, 35: 19-36.

Dewantara, D., Sofianto, E. W. N., & Munawaroh, D. (2021, November). Physics e-module: A review and bibliometric analysis. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 2104, No. 1, p. 012008). IOP Publishing.

Dewi, I. S., & Jauhariyah, M. N. R. (2021). Analisis bibliometrik implementasi pembelajaran fisika berbasis STEM pada tahun 2011-2021. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika, 5(3): 368-387.

Triwahyuningtyas, D., Sundaygara, C., Widiaty, I., Nandiyanto, A. B. D., Aji, S. D., & Hudha, M. N. (2021, March). Bibliometric analysis of the term ‘STEM module’. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering (Vol. 1098, No. 3, p. 032031). IOP Publishing.

Widiawati, R., Permanasari, A., & Ardianto, D. (2022). Science, Technology, Engineering, dan Mathematics (STEM) terhadap Kreativitas Siswa: Analisis Bibliometrik. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia Gemilang, 2(1): 57-69.

Santi, K., Sholeh, S. M., Alatas, F., Rahmayanti, H., Ichsan, I. Z., & Rahman, M. M. (2021, February). STEAM in environment and science education: Analysis and bibliometric mapping of the research literature (2013-2020). In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1796, No. 1, p. 012097). IOP Publishing.

Yanuarti, E. A., & Suprapto, N. (2021). Ten years of research on history of science (physics): A bibliometric analysis. Studies in Philosophy of Science and Education, 2(1): 7-16.

Effendi, D. N., Anggraini, W., Jatmiko, A., Rahmayanti, H., Ichsan, I. Z., & Rahman, M. M. (2021, February). Bibliometric analysis of scientific literacy using VOS viewer: Analysis of science education. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1796, No. 1, p. 012096). IOP Publishing.

Jatmiko, B., Sunarti, T., Prahani, B. K., Hariyono, E., Wibowo, F. C., Mahtari, S., & Asy’ari, M. (2021, November). Critical thinking skills on physics learning during COVID-19 pandemic: A bibliometric analysis using VOSViewer. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 2110, No. 1, p. 012020). IOP Publishing.

Masitoh, P. N. A., Latifah, S., Saregar, A., Aziz, A., & Jamaluddin, W. (2021, February). Bibliometric analysis of physics problem solving. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1796, No. 1, p. 012009). IOP Publishing.

Bitzenbauer, P. (2021). Quantum physics education research over the last two decades: A bibliometric analysis. Education Sciences, 11(11): 699.

Haryandi, S., Ibrahim, M. A., & Juliana, E. N. (2021). Bibliometric Analysis in Astrophysics: Overview of Education, Religion, and Local Wisdom in 2016-2021. IJORER: International Journal of Recent Educational Research, 2(5): 501-514.

Anderson, K. A., Crespi, M., & Sayre, E. C. (2017). Linking behavior in the physics education research coauthorship network. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 13(1): 010121.

Jatmiko, B., Prahani, B. K., Suprapto, N., Admoko, S., Deta, U. A., Lestari, N. A., ... & Muliyati, D. (2021, November). Bibliometric analysis on online physics learning during COVID-19 Pandemic: Contribution to physics education undergraduate program. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 2110, No. 1, p. 012018). IOP Publishing.

Kurtuluş, M. A., & Tatar, N. (2021). An Analysis of Scientific Articles on Science Misconceptions: A Bibliometric Research. Ilkogretim Online, 20(1).

Dewi, I. S., Mashurin, A. H., Anidhea, N. O., Jauhariyah, M. N., Prahani, B. K., Safitri, N. S., & Mubarok, H. (2021, December). Bibliometric Analysis of Research Developments in the Field of Augmented Reality in Physics Education (2012-2021*). In International Joint Conference on Science and Engineering 2021 (IJCSE 2021) (pp. 471-478). Atlantis Press.

Hidaayatullaah, H. N., Suprapto, N., Hariyono, E., Prahani, B. K., & Wulandari, D. (2021, November). Research trends on ethnoscience based learning through bibliometric analysis: Contributed to physics learning. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 2110, No. 1, p. 012026). IOP Publishing.

Yaman, A., Yoganingrum, A., Yaniasih, Y., & Riyanto, S. (2019). Tinjauan Pustaka Sistematis Pada Basis Data Pustaka Digital: Tren Riset, Metodologi, Dan Coverage Fields. Baca: Jurnal Dokumentasi Dan Informasi, 40(1): 1-20.

Harzing, A. W. K., & Van der Wal, R. (2008). Google Scholar as a new source for citation analysis. Ethics in science and environmental politics, 8(1): 61-73.

Harzing, A. W. (2019). Two new kids on the block: How do Crossref and Dimensions compare with Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus and the Web of Science?. Scientometrics, 120(1): 341-349.

Al Husaeni, D. F., & Nandiyanto, A. B. D. (2022). Mapping visualization analysis of computer science research data in 2017-2021 on the google scholar database with vosviewer. International Journal of Informatics, Information System and Computer Engineering (INJIISCOM), 3(1): 1-18.

Behl, A., Jayawardena, N., Pereira, V., Islam, N., Del Giudice, M., & Choudrie, J. (2022). Gamification and e-learning for young learners: A systematic literature review, bibliometric analysis, and future research agenda. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 176: 121445.

Van Eck, N., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. scientometrics, 84(2): 523-538.

Tomaszewska, E. J., & Florea, A. (2018). Urban smart mobility in the scientific literature—bibliometric analysis. Engineering Management in Production and Services, 10(2): 41-56.

Williams, B. (2020). Dimensions & VOSViewer bibliometrics in the reference interview. Code4Lib Journal, (47).

Ali, A., Mahfouz, A., & Arisha, A. (2017). Analysing supply chain resilience: integrating the constructs in a concept mapping framework via a systematic literature review. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 22(1).

Xia, H., Tan, S., Huang, S., Gan, P., Zhong, C., Lü, M., ... & Tang, X. (2021). Scoping Review and Bibliometric Analysis of the Most Influential Publications in Achalasia Research from 1995 to 2020. BioMed Research International, 2021, 8836395.

Strozzi, F., Colicchia, C., Creazza, A., & Noè, C. (2017). Literature review on the ‘Smart Factory’concept using bibliometric tools. International Journal of Production Research, 55(22): 6572-6591.

Dawson, S., Gašević, D., Siemens, G., & Joksimovic, S. (2014, March). Current state and future trends: A citation network analysis of the learning analytics field. In Proceedings of the fourth international conference on learning analytics and knowledge (pp. 231-240).

Zhao, D., & Strotmann, A. (2015). Analysis and Visualization of Citation Networks. Morgan & Claypool Publishers.

Kamble, S. S., Gunasekaran, A., & Gawankar, S. A. (2018). Sustainable Industry 4.0 framework: A systematic literature review identifying the current trends and future perspectives. Process safety and environmental protection, 117: 408-425.

Arum, N. A. S., Sudarmi, M., & Pattiserlihun, A. (2019). Pemanfaatan film kartun “Larva” sebagai media belajar lewat kesalahan untuk mengajarkan HOTS kepada siswa pada materi dispersi cahaya. Paedagoria: Jurnal Kajian, Penelitian dan Pengembangan Kependidikan, 10(1): 40-51.

Lutfia, W., & Putra, N. M. D. (2020). Analisis Profil Pemahaman Konsep Dan Model Mental Siswa Di Sma Kesatrian 2 Semarang Pada Materi Interferensi Dan Difraksi Cahaya. UPEJ Unnes Physics Education Journal, 9(1): 27-35.

Teng, B., Teng, P., & Hennekens, C. H. (2018). A simple way to teach single slit diffraction based on edge diffraction. The Physics Teacher, 56(6): 380-383.

Laurenty, F., Sulsilah, H., Amin, A. M., Samsudin, A., & Rusdiana, D. (2021, November). Enhancing conceptual understanding via Diffraction Grating Innovative Media (DIAGRAM). In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 2098, No. 1, p. 012013). IOP Publishing.

Purnama, A. Y., Kuswanto, H., Rani, S. A., Putranta, H., & Winingsih, P. H. (2021). Simulasi Difraksi Fraunhofer Menggunakan Media Spreadsheet dan GNU Octave Sebagai Alternatif Pembelajaran dimasa Pandemi. Kappa Journal, 5(2): 158-165.

Wang, C., Hsu, Y. C., & Chan, S. H. (2016, January). SLM-based educational kit for wave optics. In Education and Training in Optics and Photonics: ETOP 2015 (Vol. 9793, pp. 199-206). SPIE.

Billah, A., & Widiyatmoko, A. (2018). The development of virtual laboratory learning media for the physical optics subject. Jurnal ilmiah pendidikan fisika Al-Biruni, 7(2): 153-160.

Gröber, S., Vetter, M., Eckert, B., & Jodl, H. J. (2013). Diffraction and interference–-a standard teaching topic using non-standard diffracting objects. European Journal of Physics, 35(1): 015003.

Francés, J., Pérez-Molina, M., Bleda, S., Fernández, E., Neipp, C., & Beléndez, A. (2011). Educational software for interference and optical diffraction analysis in Fresnel and Fraunhofer regions based on MATLAB GUIs and the FDTD method. IEEE Transactions on Education, 55(1): 118-125.

Rodríguez, Y., Santana, A., & Mendoza, L. M. (2013). Physics education through computational tools: the case of geometrical and physical optics. Physics Education, 48(5): 621.

Lyu, B. (2017, May). Simulation and visualization of fundamental optics phenomenon by LabVIEW. In Education and Training in Optics and Photonics (p. 104523R). Optica Publishing Group.

Ghalila, H., Lakhdar, Z. B., Lahmar, S., Dhouaidi, Z., & Majdi, Y. (2013, July). Active learning in optics and photonics: Fraunhofer diffraction. In Education and Training in Optics and Photonics (p. EWP37). Optica Publishing Group.

Corlu, M. A., & Corlu, M. S. (2012). Scientific Inquiry Based Professional Development Models in Teacher Education. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 12(1): 514-521.

El Islami, R. A. Z., Nahadi, N., & Permanasari, A. (2016). Membangun Literasi Sains Siswa Pada Konsep Asam Basa Melalui Pembelajaran Inkuiri Terbimbing. Jurnal Penelitian dan Pembelajaran IPA, 2(2): 110-120.

Haerani, S. A. S., Setiadi, D., & Rasmi, D. A. C. (2020). Pengaruh model inkuiri bebas terhadap kemampuan literasi sains. Jurnal Pijar MIPA, 15(2): 140-144.

Metin Peten, D. (2022). Influence of the Argument-Driven Inquiry with explicit-reflective nature of scientific inquiry intervention on pre-service science teachers’ understandings about the nature of scientific inquiry. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 20(5): 921-941.

Saputri, D. F., & Trisianawati, E. (2021). The impact of problem-based learning and inquiry models toward students’ science process skills on the vibrations and waves chapter. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1760, No. 1, p. 012017). IOP Publishing.

Shahali, E. H. M., & Halim, L. (2010). Development and validation of a test of integrated science process skills. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 9: 142-146.

Kruea-In, N., & Buaraphan, K. (2014). Enhancing lower secondary school science teachers’ science process skills and laboratory lesson preparation through a social constructivist-based professional development workshop. The International Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Learning, 20(2): 43.

Wenning, C. J. (2005). Levels of inquiry: Hierarchies of pedagogical practices and inquiry processes. Journal of physics teacher education online, 2(3): 3-11.

Haatainen, O., & Aksela, M. (2021). Project-Based Learning in Integrated Science Education: Active Teachers' Perceptions and Practices. LUMAT: International Journal on Math, Science and Technology Education, 9(1): 149-173.

Abdurrahman, A., Nurulsari, N., Maulina, H., & Ariyani, F. (2019). Design and validation of inquiry-based STEM learning strategy as a powerful alternative solution to facilitate gift students facing 21st century challenging. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 7(1): 33-56.

Rochmawati, A., Wiyanto, W., & Ridlo, S. (2019). Analysis of 21st Century Skills of Student on Implementation Project Based Learning and Problem Posing Models in Science Learning. Journal of Primary Education, 8(4): 58-67.

Stehle, S. M., & Peters-Burton, E. E. (2019). Developing student 21st Century skills in selected exemplary inclusive STEM high schools. International Journal of STEM education, 6(1): 1-15.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26737/jipf.v8i2.3685