An Overview of Students' Conceptual Understanding in Kinematics Using Computer Based Test (CBT) Class XI SMA Negeri 19 Palembang

Ketang Wiyono; Sudirman Sudirman; Kristylia Sury; Saparini Saparini; Melly Ariska

doi:10.26737/jipf.v6i2.2037

An Overview of Students' Conceptual Understanding in Kinematics Using Computer Based Test (CBT) Class XI SMA Negeri 19 Palembang

Ketang Wiyono, Sudirman Sudirman, Kristylia Sury, Saparini Saparini, Melly Ariska

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the category of understanding the concept of kinematics using Certainty of Response Index (CRI) assisted Computer Based Test (CBT) and to determine misconceptions in class XI students of SMA Negeri 19 Palembang. The method used in this research is descriptive and the instrument used in this study is a multiple choice test using CRI and reason. The test was conducted on 57 students from class XI IPA 1 and XI IPA 3. Rasch modeling is used for the processing stage from raw data to logit numbers which will provide information related to infits and outfits in the ministep software besides manual analysis using CRI. The result of the analysis that have been carried out considering students who are outliers or misfits, data from the ministep software and the reasons for the answer given, 41 students are obtained according to the Rasch modeling and 16 students who are outliers or misfits. The result showed that the average score of concept understanding was 23.44%, while for the concept understanding category it was 2.15%, the concept understanding category but not sure was 0.00%, the misconception category was 70.02% and did not understand the concept of 27.83%. The result of the interview found several causes of misconceptions, namely the references form used in the languange in the book was difficult to understand and the learning model usel was not quite right.

Keywords

Conceptual Understanding; CBT; Kinematics

Full Text:

PDF (English)

References

PADU. (2013). Malaysia Education Blueprint 2013-2025. Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia.

Setiadi, H. (2016). Pelaksanaan penilaian pada Kurikulum 2013. Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 20(2): 166-178.

Kementrian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (2012). Pergeseran Paradigma Belajar Abad 21. [Online]. Available: http://www.kemdikbud.go.id/kemdikbud/uji-publik-kurikulum-2013-2.

Novrianti, N. (2014). Pengembangan Computer Based Testing (Cbt) Sebagai Alternatif Teknik Penilaian Hasil Belajar. Lentera Pendidikan: Jurnal Ilmu Tarbiyah Dan Keguruan, 17(1): 34-42.

Husamah, H., Fatmawati, D., & Setyawan, D. (2018). OIDDE learning model: Improving higher order thinking skills of biology teacher candidates. International Journal of Instruction, 11(2): 249-264.

Herayanti, L., Fuaddunnazmi, M., & Habibi, H. (2017). Pengembangan Media Pembelajaran Berbasis Moodle pada Mata Kuliah Fisika Dasar. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Teknologi, 1(3): 205-209.

Anderson, L. W., & Bloom, B. S. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman,.

Febrianti, J., Akhsan, H., & Muslim, M. (2019). Analisis Miskonsepsi Suhu dan Kalor Pada Siswa SMA Negeri 3 Tanjung Raja. Jurnal Inovasi dan Pembelajaran Fisika, 6{1}: 90-102.

Hakim, A., & Kadarohman, A. (2012). Student Concept Understanding of Natural Products Chemistry in Primary and Secondary Metabolites Using the Data Collecting Technique of Modified CRI. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 4(3).

Diani, R., Latifah, S., Anggraeni, Y. M., & Fujiani, D. (2018). Physics Learning Based on Virtual Laboratory to Remediate Misconception in Fluid Material. Tadris: Jurnal Keguruan Dan Ilmu Tarbiyah, 3(2): 167-181.

Yaniawati, R. P. (2013). E-learning to improve higher order thinking skills (HOTS) of students. Journal of Education and Learning, 7(2): 109-120.

Ningsih, D. R., Ramalis, T. R., & Purwana, U. (2018). Pengembangan Tes Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Berdasarkan Analisis Teori Respon Butir. WaPFi (Wahana Pendidikan Fisika), 3(2): 45-50.

Pujianto, A. (2013). Analisis konsepsi siswa pada konsep kinematika gerak lurus. JPFT (Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Tadulako Online), 1(1): 16-21.

Misykah, Z., & Adiansha, A. A. (2018, December). Effective teaching for increase higher-order thinking skills (hots) in education of elementary school. In International Conference on Mathematics and Science Education of Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia (Vol. 3, pp. 658-664).

Ariska, M. (2015). Studi pemahaman konsep siswa pada sub konsep rangkaian listrik arus searah di kelas XI SMA Negeri 1 Palembang. Jurnal Inovasi dan Pembelajaran Fisika, 2(2): 147-154.

Kurniasih, A. W. (2012). Scaffolding sebagai alternatif upaya meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir kritis matematika. Kreano, Jurnal Matematika Kreatif-Inovatif, 3(2): 113-124.

Tadeko, N., & Saehana, S. (2013). Analisis Pemahaman Soal Grafik Mahasiswa Pendidikan MIPA Menggunakan Pemodelan Rasch. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Tadulako, 1(4).

Sumintono, B., & Widhiarso, W. (2014). Aplikasi model Rasch untuk penelitian ilmu-ilmu sosial (edisi revisi). Trim Komunikata Publishing House.

Sumintono, B., & Widhiarso, W. (2015). RascH.

Han, C. (2019). William J. Boone, John R. Staver and Melissa S. Yale. Rasch Analysis in the Human Sciences. Journal of Research Design and Statistics in Linguistics and Communication Science, 5(1-2): 208–211.

Boone, W. J., Staver, J. R., & Yale, M. S. (2013). Rasch analysis in the human sciences. Springer Science & Business Media.

Syuhendri, S. (2014). Konsepsi alternatif mahasiswa pada ranah mekanika: analisis untuk konsep impetus dan kecepatan benda jatuh. Jurnal Inovasi dan Pembelajaran Fisika, 1(1): 56-68.

Rusli, W., & Haris, A. (2016). Studi Miskonsepsi Peserta Didik Kelas IX SMP Negeri 1 Makassar Pada Pokok Bahasan Gerak dan Gaya. Jurnal Sains dan Pendidikan Fisika, 12(2): 192-199.

Ariska, M., Akhsan, H., & Zulherman, Z. (2018). Utilization of Maple-based Physics Computation in Determining the Dynamics of Tippe Top. Jurnal Penelitian Fisika dan Aplikasinya (JPFA), 8(2): 123-131.

Fauziah, A., & Darvina, Y. (2019). Analisis Miskonsepsi Peserta Didik Dalam Memahami Materi Gerak Lurus Dan Gerak Parabola Pada Kelas X SMAN 1 Padang. Pillar of Physics Education, 12(1): 73-80.

Wiyono, K. (2015). Pengembangan model pembelajaran fisika berbasis ICT pada implementasi kurikulum 2013. Jurnal Inovasi Dan Pembelajaran Fisika, 2(2): 123-131.

Akhsan, H., Wiyono, K., Ariska, M., & Melvany, N. E. (2020, March). Development of HOTS (higher order thinking skills) test instruments for the concept of fluid and harmonic vibrations for high schools. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1480, No. 1, p. 012071). IOP Publishing.

Limbach, B., & Waugh, W. (2010). Developing Higher Level Thinking. Journal of Instructional Pedagogies, 3.

Amto, A., Ertikanto, C., & Nyeneng, I. D. P. (2019). Pengaruh Keterampilan berpikir kritis melalui pembelajaran berbasis aneka sumber belajar terhadap hasil belajar fisika siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 7(1): 28-38.

Saregar, A., Jamaludin, W., & Septiani, R. (2019, February). Feasibility test of mobile learning with schoology: Efforts to foster the students’ learning interest on magnetism. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1155, No. 1, p. 012060). IOP Publishing.

Syafei, I., Saregar, A., Thahir, A., Sari, P. M., & Anugrah, A. (2020, February). E-learning with STEM-Based Schoology on Static Fluid Material. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1467, No. 1, p. 012052). IOP Publishing.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26737/jipf.v6i2.2037