Physics Achievement Test Implies Students’ Self-Efficacy on Decision Making Process

Dian Mayasari; Riski Muliyani; Yudi Kurniawan; Iip Istirahayu

doi:10.26737/jipf.v4i2.955

Physics Achievement Test Implies Students’ Self-Efficacy on Decision Making Process

Dian Mayasari, Riski Muliyani, Yudi Kurniawan, Iip Istirahayu

Abstract

This research was conducted to provide a comprehensive description about how the results of the cognitive learning outcomes of the physics field were indirectly supported by self-efficacy in the decision making process of the beliefs of the chosen answers. This research is descriptive qualitative research and involves 24 samples of class X students. The sample technique chosen was purposive sampling. The testing of cognitive learning outcomes in cognitive domains was conducted and designed by physics education lecturers and self-efficacy testing carried out and designed by lecturers in the direction of guidance and counseling using attitude scales. This combination of measurements produces two decisions on self-efficacy: positive and negative. The results of the study showed that students with high self-efficacy got high scores also on the physics test of cognitive learning outcomes. These students are classified as students with positive self-efficacy. Conversely, negative self-efficacy shows that students have high self-efficacy but get low cognitive test results in cognitive domains. These results are certainly influenced by several factors including uncertainty and anxiety.

Keywords

Physics Achievement Test; Self-Efficacy; Decision Making

Full Text:

PDF (English)

References

Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan RI Nomor 22 Tahun 2016 Tentang Standar Proses Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah.

Hamzah, A. R., Achmad, Z., & Shohib, M. (2014). Efektivitas Pelatihan Sefy Untuk Meningkatkan Efikasi Diri Dalam Pengambilan Keputusan Karir Siswa. Jurnal Intervensi Psikologi, 6(1): 103-116.

Alwisol. (2009). Psikologi Kepribadian (edisirevisi). Malang: UMM Press.

Ormrod, J. E. (2006). Educational Psychology: Developing Learners (5th Edition). Ohio: Pearson.

Luszczynska, A., Mohamed, N. E., & Schwarzer, R. (2005). Self-efficacy and social support predict benefit finding 12 months after cancer surgery: The mediating role of coping strategies. Psychology, Health & Medicine, 10(4): 365-375.

Bandura, A. (1994). Self-efficacy. In V. S. Ramachaudran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human behavior, 4: 71-81. New York: Academic Press. (Reprinted in H. Friedman [Ed.], Encyclopedia of mental health.) San Diego: Academic Press.

Yuliantika, D., Rahmawati, S. W., & Palupi, S. R. (2017). Self- Efficacy dan Motivasi Berprestasi Siswa SMA Negeri 7 Purworejo. Jurnal Psiko Utama, 5(2): 51-59.

Muliyani, R., Kurniawan, Y., & Sandra, D. A. (2017). Peningkatan Keterampilan Proses Sains Terpadu Siswa melalui Implementasi Levels of Inquiry (LoI). Tadris: Jurnal Keguruan dan Ilmu Tarbiyah, 2(2): 81-86.

Kurniawan, Y., Suhandi, A., &Hasanah, L. (2016). The influence of implementation of interactive lecture demonstrations (ILD) conceptual change oriented toward the decreasing of the quantity students that misconception on the Newton’s first law. In AIP Conference Proceedings, 1708 (1): 070007.

Kurniawan, Y. (2018). Investigasi level miskonsepsi pada Hukum III Newton. Jurnal Riset dan Kajian Pendidikan Fisika, 5(1): 17-21.

Prochaksa, J.O., & DiClemente, C.C. (1992). The transtheoretical approach. In J. Norcross & M. Goldfried(Eds.), Handbook of Psychotherapy Integration. New York: Brunner.

Pajares, F., & Miller, M. D. (1995). Mathematics self-efficacy and mathematics outcomes: The need for specificity of assessment. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 42: 190-198.

Bandura, A., Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, G. V., & Pastorelli, C. (1996). Multifaceted impact of self-efficacy beliefs on academic functioning. Child development, 67(3): 1206-1222.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26737/jipf.v4i2.955