Analysis of Solving Physics Problems Using the Minnesota Model for Mechanics Concepts

Muhammad Syukri; Elva Sesioria Putri; Musdar Musdar; Lilia Halim

doi:10.26737/jipf.v8i3.3995

Analysis of Solving Physics Problems Using the Minnesota Model for Mechanics Concepts

Muhammad Syukri, Elva Sesioria Putri, Musdar Musdar, Lilia Halim

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze students' ability to solve physics problems in mechanical materials using the Minnesota problem-solving model. The research method used is descriptive qualitative research. The population in this study is class XI IPA MAN I Banda Aceh students with 10 subjects. The instrument in this study uses a description test with 5 questions. The results of this study are shown to analyze the process of students in solving physics problems that require a high level of thinking, the way students understand concepts, describe problem situations, plan solutions, carry out solutions and evaluate answers. Based on the results of the study, the average student could use the Minnesota problem-solving model in answering physics questions and using this model students are skilled at selecting relevant information, then analyzing it and finally re-researching the results.

Keywords

Analysis; Physics Problems; Minnesota Model

Full Text:

PDF (English)

References

Charli, L., Amin, A., & Agustina, D. (2018). Kesulitan siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal fisika pada materi suhu dan kalor di kelas x sma ar-risalah lubuklinggau tahun pelajaran 2016/2017. JOEAI (Journal of Education and Instruction), 1(1): 42-50.

Redish, E. F. (2005). Changing student ways of knowing: What should our students learn in a physics class. Proceedings of World View on Physics Education, 1-13.

Walsh, L. N., Howard, R. G., & Bowe, B. (2007). Phenomenographic study of students’ problem solving approaches in physics. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research, 3(2): 020108.

Ogilvie, C. A. (2009). Changes in students’ problem-solving strategies in a course that includes context-rich, multifaceted problems. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research, 5(2): 020102.

Dananjaya, U. (2013). Media Pembelajaran Aktif. Nuansa Cendekia.

Majid, A. (2013). Strategi Pembelajaran. PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Prentice, K., Burch, M., Hamlett, C. L., Owen, R., ... & Jancek, D. (2003). Explicitly teaching for transfer: Effects on third-grade students' mathematical problem solving. Journal of educational psychology, 95(2): 293-305.

Merisa, N. S., Halim, A., & Mahzum, E. (2020). The Effects of Exercise Using Minnesota Strategy Problem Solving Model to Student Learning Outcomes and Critical Thinking Ability. Asian Journal of Science Education, 2(1): 24-32.

Sulasmono, B. S. (2012). Problem solving: Signifikansi, pengertian, dan ragamnya. Satya Widya, 28(2): 155-166.

Syukri, M., Halim, L., & Meerah, T. S. M. (2012). Model Pendekatan Pakar Fisika Dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Fisika Kontekstual: Sebuah Studi Kasus. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia, 8(1):61-67.

Darvina, Y. (2008). Penyelesaian Soal-soal Fiska Menggunakan Minnesota Problem Solving Strategy.

Sujanem, R. (2012). Pengembangan modul fisika kontekstual interaktif berbasis web untuk meningkatkan pemahaman konsep dan hasil belajar fisika siswa SMA di Singaraja. Jurnal Nasional Pendidikan Teknik Informatika: Janapati, 1(2): 103-117.

Foster, T. M. (2000). The development of students' problem-solving skill from instruction emphasizing qualitative problem-solving. University of Minnesota.

Aspiandi, H., Zubaidah, Z., & Nursangaji, A. (2020). Deskripsi Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Siswa Pada Materi Bangun Datar Di SMP. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Khatulistiwa (JPPK), 9(11): 1-8.

Wardhani, S. (2010). Implikasi karakteristik matematika dalam pencapaian tujuan mata pelajaran matematika di SMP/MTs. Yogyakarta: Depdiknas PPPPTK.

Prince, M. J., & Felder, R. M. (2006). Inductive teaching and learning methods: Definitions, comparisons, and research bases. Journal of engineering education, 95(2): 123-138.

Chi, M. T. H., Glaser, R., & Rees, E. (1985). Expertise in Problem Solving. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Advances in the Psychology of Human Intelligence, 1. Hilldale, Erlbaum

Schnotz, W. (2002). Commentary: Towards an Integrated View of Learning from Text and Visual Displays. Educational Psychology Review, 14(1): 101-120.

Haryadi, R. (2015). Urgensi Matematika Dalam Memahami Konsep Kinematika. Jurnal Pengabdian dan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat (JPPM), 9(1).

Quale, A. (2011). On the role of mathematics in physics: a constructivist epistemic perspective. Science & Education, 20: 609-624.

Tzanakis, C. (2002). On the relation between mathematics and physics in undergraduate teaching. In 2nd International Conference on the Teaching of Mathematics (at the undergraduate level) (Vol. 387).

Fatmala, R. R., Sariningsih, R., & Zanthy, L. S. (2020). Analisis Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Siswa Smp Kelas VII Pada Materi Aritmetika Sosial. Jurnal Cendekia: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 4(1): 227-236.

Parulian, R. A., Munandar, D. R., & Ruli, R. M. (2020). Analisis kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis dalam menyelesaikan materi bilangan bulat pada siswa SMP. Prosiding Sesiomadika, 2(1a).

Akbar, P., Hamid, A., Bernard, M., & Sugandi, A. I. (2018). Analisis kemampuan pemecahan masalah dan disposisi matematik siswa kelas xi sma putra juang dalam materi peluang. Jurnal Cendekia: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 2(1): 144-153.

Walle, J. A. V. D. (2008). Matematika Sekolah Dasar dan Menengah Pengembangan Pengajaran. Erlangga.

Yanto, F., Festiyed, F., & Enjoni, E. (2021). Problem Based Learning Model For Increasing Problem Solving Skills In Physics Learning. JIPF (Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Fisika), 6(1): 53-65.

Hau, R. R. H., Mole, P. N., Elizabeth, A., Dua, Y. S., & Leonarda, M. Y. (2020). Students’ Multi Representation Ability in Completing Physics Evaluation Problems. JIPF (Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Fisika), 5(3): 187-192.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26737/jipf.v8i3.3995