The Practicality of Electronic Physics Module Based on Scientific Approach on Fluid Materials

Zakirman Zakirman; Chichi Rahayu; Wienda Gusta

doi:10.26737/jipf.v7i2.2719

The Practicality of Electronic Physics Module Based on Scientific Approach on Fluid Materials

Zakirman Zakirman, Chichi Rahayu, Wienda Gusta

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to describe the level of practicality of the electronic physics module based on a scientific approach to fluid materials. Research and development using a 4D model consisting of the stages of defining, designing, developing, and disseminating. The practicality test is carried out after the definition and design stages are completed. The research instrument is an observation sheet on the implementation of lesson plans, teacher response questionnaires, student response questionnaires, and the respondents are teachers and students of class XI MIA in one of the SMAN in Padang City. The method used is descriptive statistics to get the average value and percentage. An electronic physics module based on a scientific approach is said to be practical if the practitioner's assessment states that the module can be applied. Based on the teacher's response, the average percentage of 89.28% met the very practical category and the student's response was 78, 45% met the practical category. Overall, the average percentage of the practicality of the electronic physics module based on this scientific approach is 83.86% in the very practical category. This shows that the electronic physics module based on a scientific approach is easy to use and useful for teachers and students.

Keywords

Practicality; Physics Electronics Module; Scientific Approach; Fluid

Full Text:

PDF (English)

References

Oz, O., & Ozdamar, N. (2020). Academic's Views on Industry 4.0 within the Scope of Open and Distance Education. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 15(2): 58-85.

Turmudi, D. (2020). English Scholarly Publishing Activities in the Industrial Revolution 4.0: What, Why, and How?. English Language Teaching Educational Journal, 3(1): 52-63.

Bonfield, C. A., Salter, M., Longmuir, A., Benson, M., & Adachi, C. (2020). Transformation or evolution?: Education 4.0, teaching and learning in the digital age. Higher Education Pedagogies, 5(1): 223-246.

Mardiana, H., & Daniels, H. K. (2019). Technological Determinism, New Literacies and Learning Process and the Impact towards Future Learning. Online Submission, 5(3): 219-229.

Rahayu, C., & Eliyarti, E. (2019). Implementation of physics learning materials based generative learning with open-ended problem approach to stimulate critical thinking skills. JIPF (Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Fisika), 4(2): 99-109.

Iwuanyanwu, P. N. (2019). What We Teach in Science, and What Learners Learn: A Gap That Needs Bridging. Pedagogical Research, 4(2).

Wiyono, K., & Zakiyah, S. (2019, March). Pendidikan Fisika Pada Era Revolusi Industri 4. 0 Di Indonesia. In Seminar nasional pendidikan program studi pendidikan fisika (Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 1-14).

Ellermeijer, T., & Tran, T. B. (2019). Technology in teaching physics: Benefits, challenges, and solutions. In Upgrading Physics Education to Meet the Needs of Society (pp. 35-67). Springer, Cham.

Dewi, R. A. K., & Rukmini, P. (2019). The effect of thematic learning by using a scientific approach to increase the multiple intelligence of students. Jurnal Prima Edukasia, 7(1): 40-46.

Siregar, M. (2019). Pedagogical Translation Use by Scientific Approach in Teaching English. Budapest International Research and Criticsin Linguistics and Education (BirLE) Journal, 2(4): 111-119.

Goldston, M. J., & Downey, L. (2012). Your science classroom: Becoming an elementary/middle school science teacher. SAGE Publications.

Marsh, C. (2010). Becoming a teacher: Knowledge, skills and issues. Pearson Australia.

Settlage, J., & Southerland, S. (2012). Teaching science to every child: Using culture as a starting point. Routledge.

Hosnan, M. (2014). Pendekatan saintifik dan kontekstual dalam pembelajaran abad 21: Kunci sukses implementasi kurikulum 2013. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia.

Rofieq, A., Hindun, I., Shultonnah, L., & Miharja, F. J. (2021, March). Developing textbook based on scientific approach, critical thinking, and science process skills. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1839, No. 1, p. 012030). IOP Publishing.

Tambunan, H. (2019). The Effectiveness of the Problem Solving Strategy and the Scientific Approach to Students' Mathematical Capabilities in High Order Thinking Skills. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 14(2): 293-302.

Firman, F., Baedhowi, B., & Murtini, W. (2018). The effectiveness of the scientific approach to improve student learning outcomes. International Journal of Active Learning, 3(2): 86-91.

Jayanti, H. W., Sartika, R. P., & Kurniawan, R. A. (2016). Analisis Kemampuan Psikomotorik Mahasiswa Semester III Program Studi Pendidikan Kimia Universitas Muhammadiyah Pontianak. Jurnal Ilmiah Ar-Razi, 4(2).

Ramdhani, M. R., Usodo, B., & Subanti, S. (2017, September). Discovery learning with scientific approach on geometry. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 895, No. 1, p. 012033). IOP Publishing.

Siahaan, A., Hafsah, H., & Mandala, S. (2020). The Effect of Scientific Approach and Interpersonal Interaction of Islamic Education to Student Characters in Integrated Islamic School Al Hafiz Langkat District. Budapest International Research and Critics in Linguistics and Education (BirLE) Journal, 3(3): 1281-1286.

Machin, A. (2014). Implementasi pendekatan saintifik, penanaman karakter dan konservasi pada pembelajaran materi pertumbuhan. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 3(1).

Zaputra, R., Festiyed, F., Adha, Y., & Yerimadesi, Y. (2021). Meta-Analisis: Validitas dan Praktikalitas Modul IPA Berbasis Saintifik. Bio-Lectura: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 8(1): 45-56.

Syahroni, M. W., Dewi, N. R., & Kasmui, K. (2016). The Effect Of Using Digimon (Science Digital Module) With Scientific Approach At The Visualizationof Students’ Independence And Learning Results. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 5(1): 116-122.

Suarsana, I. M. (2013). Pengembangan e-modul berorientasi pemecahan masalah untuk meningkatkan keterampilan berpikir kritis mahasiswa. JPI (Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia), 2(2).

Nurohman, S. (2011). Pengembangan Modul Elektronik Berbahasa Inggris menggunakan ADDIE Model Sebagai Alat Bantu Pembelajaran Berbasis Student Centered Learning Pada Kelas bertaraf Internasional. In Prosiding Seminar Nasional Penelitian. Pendidikan dan Penerapan MIPA. Fakultas MIPA. Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta (Vol. 14).

Kurniawan, E. D., Nopriyanti, N., & Syofii, I. (2018). Pengembangan Modul Elektronik Berbasis Pendekatan Saintifik Pada Matakuliah CAD/CAM. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknik Mesin, 5(2): 185-194.

Wena, M. (2009). Strategi Pembelajaran Inovatif Kontemporer. Yogyakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Hussain, A., Azeem, M., & Shakoor, A. (2011). Physics teaching methods: scientific inquiry vs traditional lecture. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 1(19): 269-276.

Zakirman, Z., & Hidayati, H. (2017). Praktikalitas Media Video dan Animasi dalam Pembelajaran Fisika di SMP. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika Al-Biruni, 6(1): 85-93.

Agustyaningrum, N., & Gusmania, Y. (2017). Praktikalitas dan keefektifan modul geometri analitik ruang berbasis konstruktivisme. Jurnal Dimensi, 6(3).

Tolla, A., & Hamsa, A. (2016). The Development of Indonesian Language Learning Materials Based on Local Wisdom of the First Grade Students in Sma Negeri 3 Palopo. Journal of Language Teaching & Research, 7(5).

Kurniati, D. (2013). Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran matematika sekolah menengah pertama dengan sistem character based integrated learning. Kreano, Jurnal Matematika Kreatif-Inovatif, 4(2): 159-173.

Riduwan. (2009). Belajar Mudah Penelitian Untuk Guru, Karyawan dan Peneliti Pemula. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Zakirman, Z., Lufri, L., Khairani, K., & Rahayu, C. (2020). Implementation of The Play-Think-Pair-Share (PTPS) Learning Model for Elementary School Students to Master Part of Top Skill 2020. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research (IJSTR), 9(03): 4643-4648.

Kartika, E. (2015). Pengajuan masalah matematika berdasarkan open-ended problem picture ditinjau dari kemampuan matematika. Jurnal Apotema, 1(2): 36-46.

Eliyarti, E., & Rahayu, C. (2019). Tinjauan motivasi berprestasi mahasiswa teknik dalam perkuliahan kimia dasar. Jurnal Pendidikan Glasser, 3(2): 196-204.

Agung, I. G., Dantes, N., & Tika, N. (2014). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Generatif Terhadap Minat Dan Hasil Belajar IPA Pada Siswa Kelas V SD. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Ganesha, 4(3): 1-10.

Ariani, N. M. D., Candiasa, I. M., Kom, M. I., & Marhaeni, A. N. (2014). Pengaruh implementasi open-ended problem dalam pembelajaran matematika terhadap kemampuan pemecahan masalah dengan pengendalian kemampuan penalaran abstrak. Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi pendidikan Indonesia, 4(1).

Rahayu, C., & Eliyarti, E. (2019). Deskripsi efektivitas kegiatan praktikum dalam perkuliahan kimia dasar mahasiswa teknik. Edu Sains: Jurnal Pendidikan Sains dan Matematika, 7(2): 51-60.

Eliyarti, E., Rahayu, C., & Zakirman, Z. (2020). Deskripsi Pengetahuan Awal Alat Praktikum Materi Koloid Dalam Perkuliahan Kimia Dasar Mahasiswa Teknik. Dalton: Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia dan Ilmu Kimia, 3(1).

Eliyarti, E., Rahayu, C., & Zakirman, Z. (2021). Penerapan Bahan Ajar Fisika Dengan Variasi Bentuk Tugas Berbasis Web Untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Mahasiswa Teknik. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Undiksha, 10(2): 82-90.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26737/jipf.v7i2.2719