Peer Instruction Dialogical Argumentation Model (PIDAM) for Authentic Learning of Science
Abstract
Keywords
Full Text:
PDF (English)References
Alvarez-Alvarado, M. S., Mora, C., & Cevallos-Reyes, C. B. (2019). Peer instruction to address alternative conceptions in Einstein's special relativity. Revista Brasileira de Ensino de Física, 41(4).
Passeri, S. M. R. R., & Mazur, E. (2019). Peer Instruction-Based Feedback Sessions Improve the Retention of Knowledge in Medical Students. Revista Brasileira de Educação Médica, 43(3): 155-162.
Foutz, T. L. (2018). Collaborative Argumentation As A Learning Strategy To Improve Student Performance In Engineering Statics: A Pilot Study. American Journal of Engineering Education (AJEE), 9(1): 11-22.
Rapanta, C. (2018). Potentially argumentative teaching strategies—And how to empower them. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 52(3): 451-464.
Aina, J. K. Peer Instruction in Electromagnetism: The Gender Academic Performance Difference Among Pre-Service Teachers. Studies (ISSN 2455-2526), 8(1): 80-93.
Crouch, C. H., Watkins, J., Fagen, A. P., & Mazur, E. (2007). Peer instruction: Engaging students one-on-one, all at once. Research-based reform of university physics, 1(1): 40-95.
Koul, R., Lerdpornkulrat, T., & Poondej, C. (2016). Gender compatibility, math-gender stereotypes, and self-concepts in math and physics. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 12(2): 020115.
Moore, C. G., Carter, R. E., Nietert, P. J., & Stewart, P. W. (2011). Recommendations for planning pilot studies in clinical and translational research. Clinical and translational science, 4(5): 332-337.
Murphy, P., & Whitelegg, E. (2006). Girls in the physics classroom: A review of the research on the participation of girls in physics. London, UK: Institute of Physics.
Kelly, A. M. (2016). Social cognitive perspective of gender disparities in undergraduate physics. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 12(2): 020116.
Lock, R. M., & Hazari, Z. (2016). Discussing underrepresentation as a means to facilitating female students’ physics identity development. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 12(2): 020101.
Aina, J. K. , & Azeez, A. A. (2018). The Peer Instruction’s Effectiveness as Teaching Pedagogy: Research Reviews. Cross-Currents: An International Peer-Reviewed Journal on Humanities & Social Sciences, 4(4): 63-68.
Pearce, S. (2016). Authentic learning: what, why and how. E-teaching; Management Strategies for the Classroom,10: 1-3.
Rule, A. C. (2006). The Components of Authentic Learning. Journal of Authentic Learning, 3(1): 1-10.
Herrington, J., Reeves, T. C., & Oliver, R. (2009). A practical guide to authentic e-learning. New York: Routledge.
Aina, J. K., & Langenhoven, K. R. (2015). The likely implications of active learning in physics through peer instruction (PI) in Nigerian schools. International Journal of Law, Education, Social and Sports Studies (IJLESS), 2(3): 8-15.
Akanbi, A. O., Omosewo, E. O., Abdulraheem, R. F., & Ojediran, A. I. (2017). Misconceptions of electromagnetism held by physics students in Northcentral Nigerian colleges of education. Journal of Science, Technology, Mathematics and Education (JOSTMED), 13(2): 176-185
Tellings, A. (2012). The role of theory in educational research. The Research Council of Norway, UTDANNING.
Bada, S. O., & Olusegun, S. (2015). Constructivism learning theory: A paradigm for teaching and learning. Journal of Research & Method in Education, 5(6): 66-70.
Dagar, V., & Yadav, A. (2016). Constructivism: A paradigm for teaching and learning. Arts and Social Sciences Journal, 7(4): 1-4.
O'Neill, T. A., Hancock, S., McLarnon, M. J., & Holland, T. (2020). When the SUIT Fits: Constructive Controversy Training in Face‐to‐Face and Virtual Teams. Negotiation and Conflict Management Research, 13(1): 44-59.
Smith, K. A. (2013). Introduction to Constructive Controversy: The Art of Arguing to Enhance Learning. Lilly Teaching Seminar, Michigan State University. Verfügbar unter http://personal. cege. umn. edu/~ smith/docs/Smith-MSU-4-11-13-controversy. pdf [31.12. 2014].
Hui, F., & Koplin, M. (2011). The implementation of authentic activities for learning: A case study in finance education. E-Journal of Business Education & Scholarship of Teaching, 5(1): 59-72.
Cox-Petersen, A. M., & Olson, J. K. (2000). Authentic science learning in the digital age. Learning and leading with Technology, 27(6): 32-35.
Cey, T. (2001). Moving towards constructivist classrooms. EdCmm 802.6. Retrieved September 23, 2016, fromhttp://etad.usask.ca/802papers/ceyt/ceyt.pdf
Herrington, J., & Oliver, R. (2000). An instructional design framework for authentic learning environments. Educational technology research and development, 48(3): 23-48.
McInerney, D. M., & McInerney, V. (2002). Educational psychology: Constructing Learning (3rd ed.). Frenchs Forest: Prentice-Hall.
Fox, R. (2001). Constructivism examined. Oxford review of education, 27(1): 23-35.
Brandon, A. F., & All, A. C. (2010). Constructivism theory analysis and application to curricula. Nursing education perspectives, 31(2): 89-92.
Tichy, M., Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Roseth, C. J. (2010). The impact of constructive controversy on moral development. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 40(4): 765-787.
Deshpande, P., Lee, C. B., & Ahmed, I. (2019, February). Evaluation of peer instruction for cybersecurity education. In Proceedings of the 50th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (pp. 720-725).
Pearson, R. J. (2019). Exploring Peer Instruction: Should Cohort Clicker Responses Appear During or After Polling?. Journal of Chemical Education, 96(5): 873-879.
Gok, T. (2012). The Impact of Peer Instruction On College Students’ Beliefs About Physics and Conceptual Understanding of Electricity And Magnetism. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 10(2): 417-436.
Bian, H., Bian, Y., Li, J., Li, Y., Ma, Y., Shao, X., & Xu, J. (2018). Peer instruction in a physiology laboratory course in China. Advances in physiology education, 42(3): 449-453.
Ouko, S., Aurah, C., & Amadalo, M. (2015). Peer Instruction and Secondary School Students' Achievement in Vectors. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(27): 175-180.
Al-Hebaishi, S. M. (2017). The Effect of Peer Instruction Method on Pre-Service Teachers' Conceptual Comprehension of Methodology Course. Journal of Education and Learning: 6(3), 70-82.
Nielsen, K. L., Hansen-Nygård, G., & Stav, J. B. (2012). Investigating peer instruction: How the initial voting session affects students' experiences of group discussion. ISRN education, 2012.
Nitta, H. (2010). Mathematical theory of peer-instruction dynamics. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research, 6(2): 020105.
Osborne, J., Simon, S., Christodoulou, A., Howell‐Richardson, C., & Richardson, K. (2013). Learning to argue: A study of four schools and their attempt to develop the use of argumentation as a common instructional practice and its impact on students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(3): 315-347.
Sampson, V., Enderle, P., & Grooms, J. (2013). Argumentation in science education. The Science Teacher, 80(5): 30.
Acar, O. (2015). Examination of Science Learning Equity through Argumentation and Traditional Instruction Noting Differences in Socio-Economic Status. Science Education International, 26(1): 24-41.
Crouch, C. H., Watkins, J., Fagen, A. P., & Mazur, E. (2007). Peer instruction: Engaging students one-on-one, all at once. Research-based reform of university physics, 1(1): 40-95.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education. New York: Routledge.
Mazur, E. (1997). Peer instruction: a user's manual. Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall.
Mathers, N., Fox, N., & Hunn, A. (1998). Trent focus for research and development in primary health care: Using interviews in a research project. Trent Focus.
Bloom, B., & Crabtree, B. (2006). Making sense of qualitative research: The qualitative research interview. Medical Education, 40: 314-321.
Lombardi, M. M. (2007). Authentic learning for the 21st century: An overview. Educause learning initiative, 1(2007): 1-12.
Herrington, J. A. (1997). Authentic learning in interactive multimedia environments. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http://ro.ecu.edu.au/theses/1478
Watters, J. J., & Ginns, I. S. (2000). Developing motivation to teach elementary science: Effect of collaborative and authentic learning practices in preservice education. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 11(4): 301-321.
Hilt, L. (2011). What Do We Mean by Authentic Learning? Powerful learning practice. Retrieved from http://plpnetwork.com/2011/04/21/what-do-we-mean-by-authentic-learning/
Andersson, S. B., & Andersson, I. (2005). Authentic Learning in a Sociocultural Framework: A case study on non‐formal learning. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 49(4): 419-436.
Hidden curriculum (2014, August 26). In S. Abbott (Ed.). The glossary of education reform. Retrieved from http://edglossary.org/hidden-curriculum.
Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. (1999). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Lambert, N. M., & McCombs, B. L. (1998). How students learn: Reforming schools through learner-centered education (pp. xiv-540). American Psychological Association.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2011). Constructive Controversy: Energizing Learning. Small Group Learning in Higher Education: Research and Practice, Cooper, JL & Robinson, P.(editors), New Forums Press, Stillwater, Oklahoma: 114-121.
Har, L. B. (2013). Authentic learning. The Hong Kong Institute of Education. Retrieved from http://www.ied.edu.hk/aclass/
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Herrington, J., & Kervin, L. (2007). Authentic learning supported by technology: Ten suggestions and cases of integration in classrooms. Educational Media International, 44(3): 219-236.
Kola, A. J. (2017). The physics authentic learning experience through the peer instruction. LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing.
Gok, T. (2014). Peer instruction in the physics classroom: Effects on gender difference performance, conceptual learning, and problem solving. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 13(6): 776.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26737/jipf.v6i1.1876
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2021 Aina Jacob Kola
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Publisher
Institute of Managing and Publishing of Scientific Journals
STKIP Singkawang
Jl. STKIP, Kelurahan Naram, Kecamatan Singkawang Utara, Kota Singkawang, Kalimantan Barat, Indonesia
Website: http://journal.stkipsingkawang.ac.id/index.php/JIPF
Email: [email protected]
JIPF Indexed by:
Copyright (c) JIPF (Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Fisika)
ISSN 2477-8451 (Online) and ISSN 2477-5959 (Print)