the Prevailing 2013 Curriculum in Junior High School Practice: Teacher Perspective

Bunyamin Bunyamin, Khoerul Umam

Abstract


The 2013 Curriculum has been implemented in various schools in Jakarta. Although, the concept has been debated among teachers, and practitioners, some private and public schools in Jakarta have fully implemented this curriculum. The main purpose of this study was to examine teachers understanding of the prevailing 2013 Curriculum. This study used mix methods. The quantitative method was used to examine the teachers’ competence about the 2013 Curriculum, while the qualitative method was used to strengthen and explore teachers’ responses about curriculum in classroom practices. There were three different aspects that evaluated such as training period, classroom practice, and students' classroom engagement. The participant included 125 junior high school teachers from different parts of Jakarta. Data were collected through an online survey with a Likert scale. Data were analyzed by descriptive statistics. The result of this study reported that teachers have enough time to get their training but they need extra time to prepare for classroom practice. Students who be engaged the 2013 Curriculum in classroom practice have been supported to work collaboratively with their peers.  Teachers need to be prepared such as equipment, classroom plan, book for the teacher, and time for meeting among their peer teaching. In the class practice, teachers need allotted time to prepare for teaching and examination.

Keywords


The 2013 Curriculum; Classroom Practice; Teachers perspective

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ainley, M., & Ainley, J. (2011). Student engagement with science in early adolescence: The contribution of enjoyment to students’ continuing interest in learning about science. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(1), 4–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2010.08.001

Albadi, N. M., Harkins, J., & O’Toole, J. M. (2018). Recent Reforms in Saudi Secondary Science Education: Teacher and Student Perceptions of Grade 10 Physics. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-018-9881-3

Albadi, N. M., Harkins, J., & Toole, J. M. O. (2019). Recent Reforms in Saudi Secondary Science Education : Teacher and Student Perceptions of Grade 10 Physics.

Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Flip Your Classroom Reach Every Student in Every Class Every Day. https://doi.org/10.1111/teth.12165

Eren, A. (2018). Pre-service teachers ’ beliefs about the teaching profession, curriculum orientations, and personal responsibility. Curriculum Perspectives, 38(1), 1–14.

Huincahue, J., Borromeo-Ferri, R., & Mena-Lorca, J. (2018). Math modeling knowledge from reflection in math teachers initial training. Ensenanza De Las Ciencias, 36(1), 99–115. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/ensciencias.2277

Karunia, A. T., Amin, M. M., & Chiar, M. (2018). Improving The Quality of Process Standard Based on School-Based Management, 3(2), 252–259.

Kuks, J. B. M. (2010). The bachelor-master structure ( two-cycle curriculum ) according to the Bologna agreement : a Dutch experience. Tijdschrift Voor Medisch Onderwijs, 29(1), 16–21.

le Roux, I., & Nagel, L. (2018). Seeking the best blend for deep learning in a flipped classroom – viewing student perceptions through the Community of Inquiry lens. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-018-0098-x

Lloyd, A., Truong, S., & Gray, T. (2018). Take the class outside! A call for place-based outdoor learning in the Australian primary school curriculum. Curriculum Perspectives, 38(2), 163–167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41297-018-0050-1

Long, T., Cummins, J., & Waugh, M. (2017). Use of the flipped classroom instructional model in higher education: instructors’ perspectives. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 29(2), 179–200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-016-9119-8

Song, L., Boo, H., & Nie, Y. (2018). Attitude Towards Persons with Intellectual Disability Scale : Further Development. Curr Psychol, 37, 760–768. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-017-9560-5

Tan, M. (2018). When Makerspaces Meet School: Negotiating Tensions Between Instruction and Construction. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 75–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-018-9749-x

Umam, K. (2011). Perbedaan Hasil Belajar Matemtika Siswa dengan Metode Problem Posing dan Metode Ekspositori di SMPN 188 Jakarta Materi Teorema Pythagoras. In Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika 2011 (pp. 182–190).

Umam, K., Suswandari, S., Asiah, N., & Rohim, S. (2017). The Effect of Think-Pair-Share Cooperative Learning Model Assisted With ICT on Mathematical Problem Solving Ability among Junior High School Students. In Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Computers in Education (pp. 94–18).

Utami, E., Wahyudi, & Fadillah. (2018). Management of kindergarten ( TK ) Parenting Program IN Mujahidin 2 ON EAST Pontianak District. Journal of Education, Teaching and Learning, 3(2), 273–281.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26737/jetl.v4i2.957

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Published by:

Institute of Managing and Publishing of Scientific Journals STKIP Singkawang

Sekolah Tinggi Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan (STKIP) Singkawang

Address : STKIP Singkawang, Jalan STKIP - Kelurahan Naram Singkawang, Kalimantan Barat, INDONESIA, 79251
No. Telp.   : +62562 420 0344
No. Fax.    : +62562 420 0584

JETL (Journal of  Education, Teaching, and Learning)

e-ISSN : 2477-8478

p-ISSN : 2477-5924

Editor in Chief Contact: [email protected] / Wa: +6282142072788

Publisher Contact: [email protected] / Wa: +6282142072788

Management Tools

     

JETL Indexed by:

  

 

  Creative Commons License

JETL (Journal of Education, Teaching, and Learning) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.