The Effect of Teaching Method and Lecture Program on Students’ Satisfaction Rates and Academic Achievement

Tomo Djudin

doi:10.26737/jetl.v3i1.322

The Effect of Teaching Method and Lecture Program on Students’ Satisfaction Rates and Academic Achievement

Tomo Djudin

Abstract

This research examined the effect of teaching method and lecture program on student satisfaction rate and academic achievement of physics education department of Education and Teacher Training (FKIP) of Tanjungpura University, Pontianak. The descriptive method with the causal-comparative study was employed in this research. The sample was (232) respondents of fifth semester in academic year 2016/2017 which drawn by using unproportioned stratified random sampling technique. A questionnaire of lecturer academic service satisfaction was administered. Based on data analysis, the findings of this research are: (1) There is a significant difference of student's satisfaction rate with lecturers’ academic service (t = 5.455, p ‹ 0.05) and academic achievement (t = 4.149, p ‹ 0.05) in terms of lecture method and direct instruction model. The students who having received direct instruction show higher on statisfaction rate and academic achevement than who having received lecture method; (2) There is a significant main effect of the lecture program on the rate of student satisfaction (F= 30.346, p ‹ 0.05) and on students academic achievement (F= 15.646, p ‹ 0.05); (3) There is no significant interaction effect of the teaching method and lecture program on student satisfaction rate (F= 0.753, p › 0.05) and academic achievement (F= 0.326, p › 0.05). It recommends that an institution should undertake internal survey to explore student satisfaction with academic services periodically.

Keywords

statisfaction rate; academic achievement; main and interaction effects

Full Text:

PDF

References

P. Kotler, Manajemen Pemasaran. Edisi Millennium (Terjemahan), Jakarta: Prenhallindo, 2002.

V. Rivai, Performance Appraisal (Sistem yang Tepat untuk Menilai Kinerja Karyawan dan Meningkatkan Daya Saing Perusahaan), Jakarta : PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, 2005.

F. Tjiptono, Manajemen Jasa. Edisi Ketiga. Yogyakarta : PT Andi, 2004.

J.W. Creswell, Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research (3rd ed), Boston : Pearson Prentice Hall, 2008.

Wahana Komputer, Panduan Praktis SPSS 17 untuk Pengolahan data Statistik, Yogyakarta: C.V Ando Offset, 2009.

G.A. Ferguson, Statistical Analysis in Psychology and Education (4th edition). Tokyo : Mc-Graw Hill Kogakusha Ltd,1976.

J. Xiao and S.Wilkins, (2015). The effects of lecturer commitment on student perceptions of teaching quality and student satisfaction in Chinese higher education,” Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, vol.37, no.1, pp. 98-110, 2015.

S.F.Yeoh, J.S.Yo and B.Y.F. Chan,”Student evaluation of lecturer performance among private university students,” Canadian Social Science, vol. 8, no.4, pp. 238-243, 2012.

Husnayetti,”Tingkat kepuasan mahasiswa dan proses belajar mengajar di Perguruan Tinggi STIE Ahmad Dahlan Jakarta,” Jurnal Liquidity. Vol 1, No. 2, hal.115-124, Juli-Desember 2012.

H. Alves and M. Raposo,”The measurement of the construct satisfaction in higher education,” Services Industries Journal, vol.29, no.2, pp. 203-218, 2009.

N.R.Dewi and M.Asikin,”Kepuasan mahasiswa terhadap proses perkuliahan di FMIPA UNNES”, Jurnal Lembar Ilmu Kependidikan, vol. 39, no. 2, Desember 2009.

I. Gusti, ”Analisa kepuasan mahasiswa terhadap proses belajar mengajar di Program Diploma III FE UNUD,” Buletin Studi Ekonomi, vol. 13, no.1, hal. 12-18, 2008.

O.Helgesen and E. Nesset, ”Images, satisfaction and antecedents: drivers of student loyalty? A case study of a Norwegian University College,” Corporate Reputation Review, vol.10, no.1, pp. 38-59, 2007.

C.R. Allred and M.J.Swenson,”Using technology to increase student preparation for and participation in marketing courses: The random selector model,”Marketing Education Review,vol.16, pp.15-21, 2006.

D. Dill and M. Soo, “Academic quality, league tables, and public policy: A cross-national analysis of university ranking systems,” Journal of Higher Education, vol.49, no.4,pp. 495-533,2005.

J.A.Hamid and Z.A.Pihie,”Students' perception of the quality of teaching and learning in Business Studies Programs,” Pertanika Journal Social Science and Humaniora, vol.12, no. 1, pp.71-86, 2004.

E. Bigne, M.A. Moliner and J.Sanchez,”Perceived quality and satisfaction in multiservice organisations: The case of Spanish public services,”Journal of Services Marketing, vol.17, no.4, pp. 420-442, 2003.

R.Handayani, T.K.Yermias, and Ratminto,”Analisis kepuasan pemakai terhadap pelayanan Perpustakaan Nasional Provinsi Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta”, Jurnal Sosiosains, vol. 17, no. 2, hal. 34-40, April 2003.

D.N. Harris and R.S.Tim,” Teacher training, teacher quality and student achievement.,” in National Center for Analysis of Longitudinal Data in Education Research, working paper, 2007, March 2007.

A. Tella, ”Teachers variable as predictors of primary school pupil’s academic achievement,”,2006, paper presented at the 1st African Conference on Universal Basic Education. University of Botswana.

D.Hidayat,”Akreditasi, sertifikasi lembaga pendidikan dan kejuruan”, Proceeding Makalah, 2004, Konvensi Nasional Aptekoindo II dan Temu Karya XIII FT/FPTK/JPTK Universitas/IKIP se- Indonesia, Jakarta: 12 – 14 Februari 2004. hal. 88.

C.L. Chua and R.K.K.Heng.(2014).”Students’ ratings of teaching effectiveness: What do students tell us about their teacher education lecturers?.[online].Avaiable.http:/www.iced2014.se/proceedings/1536_Chua%20POSTER.pdf

Juniarti & Sany.(2012).”Lecturer profile, student satisfaction rate and teaching method, its contribution to the passing rate.[omline].Avaiable:http;//www.academia. edu/lecturer_Profile_studen/7848356/

Aswandi,,”Analisis prestasi akademik mahasiswa Universitas Tanjungpura ditinjau dari jalur seleksi masuk (SNMPTN, SBMPTN, dan Mandiri) dan program kuliah (S-1 Reguler dan Nonreguler).Laporan Penelitian. Untan Pontianak, 2016.

Wagiran,”Kepuasan mahasiswa jurusan pendidikan teknik mesin terhadap layanan akademik dan nonakademik, Laporan Penelitian, Fakultas Teknik UNY, 2012.

M.S. Haas,”The influence of teaching method on student’s achievement on Virginia’s End of Course Standards of learning test for algebra I,” Dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 2002.

A.E.Setiawan,”Perangkat pengkuran tingkat kepuasan mahasiswa terhadap proses pembelajaran di jurusan Teknik Mesin Universitas Negeri Semarang,” Skripsi, PMIPA, 2013.

Noermijati,”Kajian tentang kepuasan mahasiswa terhadap kinerja dosen di Fakultas Ekonomi UNIBRAW,” Skripsi, 2010.

M.Ulfa,”analisis tingkat kepuasan mahasiswa terhadap kinerja dosen dalam pembelajaran pada program studi pendidikan ekonomi universitas riau,” skripsi, PMIPA, 2009.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26737/jetl.v3i1.322

Refbacks

There are currently no refbacks.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Published by:

Institute of Managing and Publishing of Scientific Journals STKIP Singkawang

Sekolah Tinggi Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan (STKIP) Singkawang

Address : STKIP Singkawang, Jalan STKIP - Kelurahan Naram Singkawang, Kalimantan Barat, INDONESIA, 79251
No. Telp. : +62562 420 0344
No. Fax. : +62562 420 0584

JETL (Journal of Education, Teaching, and Learning)

e-ISSN : 2477-8478

p-ISSN : 2477-5924