Improving Students’ Argumentation Style Ability in Writing Essay through Discourse Analysis Model Critical Thinking Map Oriented

R. Panca Pertiwi Hidayati


Students’ ability in writing anessay, as one of language skills which can improve the creativity in language, is a serious problem that should be investigated by a deep research. Besides for showing that language as a thinking tool, writing competence can be seen as a product if we take a look from critical thinking ability measurement aspect and also as a process if we take a look at the individual development itself aspect. One of indicator for measuring the students’ critical is by the ability in delivering their argumentation style which is showed in their essay. The goal of this research is obtaining the objective discourse analysis model critical thinking map oriented in improving students’ argumentation style skills in writing anessay, hence can be used as a modelling for the growing of students’ creativity in a variety of writing skills. Based on paired-samples t test, the pre-test/post-test paired-sample is significant, because the significance (2-tailed) is less than 0.05 in the standard of 95%. This is mean, there is a real difference between the ability before and after getting the treatment. The sample’s ability after getting the treatment is better than before. As well as if be compared with control class, experiment class shows the significant superiority for all aspects of essay writing assessment.


Argumentation Style; Discourse Analysis Model Critical Thinking Map Oriented;Writing Essay

Full Text:



A.C. Alwasilah. “Pendidikan Berpikir Kritis: dari CDA sampai Kurikulum Pembelajaran,” presentedin Kongres Linguistik Nasional, 2005.

Dharmojo. (2004). “Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) sebagai Model Pembelajaran Sastra.” Internet:, Jul. 20, 2004 [Jan. 16, 2017].

G. Keraf.Argumentasi dan Narasi. Jakarta: PT Gramedia.Pustaka Utama, 2007.

J.R.Fraenkel & N.E. Wallen. How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education. New York: Mc Graw-Hill Publishing Commpany, 1990.

L. Cohen, L. Manion, and K. Morrison. Methodology of Educational Research. Athens: Ekfrasi, 1997.

S. Isaac and W.B. Michael. Handbook in Research and Evaluation. San Diego: EdITS Publishers, 1983.

D. Van Dalen. Logic and structure. Springer, 2004

E.T. Ruseffendi. Statistika Dasar untuk Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung: CV. Andira, 1998.

G. Suharto. Metodologi Penelitian dalam Pendidikan Bahasa: Suatu Pengantar.Jakarta: Depdikbud Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi Proyek Pengembangan Lembaga Pendidikan Tenaga Kependidikan, 1988.

I.Hadjar.Dasar-Dasar Metodologi Penelitian Kuantitatif dalam Pendidikan. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 1996.

J.R. Craig andL.P. Metze. Methods of psychological research. Philadelphia: Saunders, 1986.

R.P.P. Hidayati. Pembelajaran Menulis Esai Berorientasi Peta Berpikir Kritis. Bandung: Prisma Press, 2010.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Published by:

Institute of Managing and Publishing of Scientific Journals STKIP Singkawang

JETL (Journal of  Education, Teaching and Learning)

e-ISSN : 2477-8478

p-ISSN : 2477-5924

Sekolah Tinggi Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan (STKIP) Singkawang

Address : STKIP Singkawang, Jalan STKIP - Kelurahan Naram Singkawang, Kalimantan Barat, INDONESIA, 79251
No. Telp.   : +62562 420 0344
No. Fax.    : +62562 420 0584

Editor in Chief: [email protected] / Wa: +6282142072788

Coordinator: [email protected] / [email protected] / Wa: +6282142072788

Management Tools


JETL Indexed by:



  Creative Commons License

Journal of Education, Teaching and Learning is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.