The Relationship Between VARK Learning Styles and Students’ Perceptions of the Classroom Learning Environment

Alifia Dewi Hariyani, Susy Budi Astuti, Prasetyo Wahyudie, Anggri Indraprasti

Abstract


This study examined elementary school students’ learning style preferences based on the VARK (Visual, Aural, Reading/Writing, and Kinesthetic) model and aimed to explore how these preferences relate to students' perceptions of the classroom learning environment. A quantitative approach was used, involving 120 sixth-grade students at an elementary school in Pontianak. Data were collected through the VARK questionnaire and the classroom environment perception questionnaire. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and One-Way ANOVA to identify the distribution of learning styles and examine differences in students' perceptions of the classroom environment. The findings indicated that unimodal learning styles were more dominant, with kinesthetic as the most common preference among students. The analysis revealed no significant differences in students’ perceptions of the classroom environment across the various learning style groups. These findings suggest that although students have different learning preferences, they tend to perceive the classroom environment in similar ways. Therefore, understanding students’ learning styles can support the development of more responsive and inclusive learning environments in elementary schools.

Keywords


VARK; learning styles; classroom environment; student perception; elementary education

Full Text:

PDF

References


Barrett, P., Zhang, Y., Davies, F., & Barrett, L. (2015). The impact of classroom design on pupils’ learning: Final results of a holistic, multi-level analysis. Building and Environment, 89, 118–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.02.013

Byers, T., Hartnell-Young, E., & Imms, W. (2018). Empirical evaluation of different classroom spaces on students’ perceptions of the use and effectiveness of one-to-one technology. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(1), 153–164. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12518

Cheryan, S., Ziegler, S. A., Plaut, V. C., & Meltzoff, A. N. (2014). Designing classrooms to maximize student achievement. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1(1), 4–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732214548677

Cleveland, B., & Fisher, K. (2014). The evaluation of physical learning environments: A critical review of the literature. Learning Environments Research, 17, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-013-9149-3

Fleming, N. D. (2012). Teaching and learning styles: VARK strategies. Christchurch: VARK Learn Limited.

Fraser, B. J. (2012). Classroom learning environments: Retrospect, context and prospect. In B. J. Fraser, K. G. Tobin, & C. J. McRobbie (Eds.), The second international handbook of science education (pp. 1191–1239). Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9041-7_79

Husmann, P. R., & O’Loughlin, V. D. (2019). Another nail in the coffin for learning styles? Disparities among undergraduate anatomy students’ study strategies, class performance, and reported VARK learning styles. Anatomical Sciences Education, 12(1), 6–19. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1777

Kariippanon, K. E., Cliff, D. P., Lancaster, S. L., Okely, A. D., & Parrish, A. M. (2019). Flexible learning spaces facilitate interaction, collaboration and behavioural engagement in secondary school. PLoS ONE, 14(10). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0223607

Mayasari, D., Yulaini, E., & Utomo, B. (2025). Pengaruh lingkungan belajar terhadap hasil belajar siswa pada mata pelajaran IPAS kelas IV SD Negeri 230 Palembang. Lambda: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA dan Aplikasinya, 5(3), 791–796. https://doi.org/10.58218/lambda.v5i3.1520

Newton, P. M., & Miah, M. (2017). Evidence-based higher education – Is the learning styles ‘myth’ important? Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 444. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00444

Newton, P. M., & Salvi, A. (2020). How common is belief in the learning styles neuromyth, and does it matter? A pragmatic systematic review. Frontiers in Education, 5, 602451. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2020.602451

Schunk, D. H. (2020). Learning theories: An educational perspective (8th ed.). Boston: Pearson.

Satriani, D. H., Amran, M., & Anggraini, L. (2023). Analisis gambaran lingkungan kelas dan motivasi belajar siswa sekolah dasar. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Sekolah Dasar, 3(2), 181–188. https://doi.org/10.26858/jppsd.v3i2.47669

Sumarli, S., Nurhayati, N., & Marantika, M. (2022). Persepsi siswa kelas V SD terhadap pembelajaran daring di masa pandemi COVID-19. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar, 9(2), 276–286. https://doi.org/10.46368/jpd.v9i2.492




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26737/jetl.v10i2.8887

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Published by:

Institute of Managing and Publishing of Scientific Journals STKIP Singkawang

Sekolah Tinggi Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan (STKIP) Singkawang

Address : STKIP Singkawang, Jalan STKIP - Kelurahan Naram Singkawang, Kalimantan Barat, INDONESIA, 79251
No. Telp.   : +62562 420 0344
No. Fax.    : +62562 420 0584

JETL (Journal of  Education, Teaching, and Learning)

e-ISSN : 2477-8478

p-ISSN : 2477-5924

Editor in Chief Contact: [email protected] / Wa: +6282142072788

Publisher Contact: [email protected] / Wa: +6282142072788

Management Tools

     

JETL Indexed by:

  

 

  Creative Commons License

JETL (Journal of Education, Teaching, and Learning) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.