Feasibility Test of A Testing Station Trainer Situated in Virtual Reality Integrates Computational Thinking Concepts

Didik Hariyanto; Nurhening Yuniarti; Ilmawan Mustaqim; Amelia Fauziah Husna; Andik Asmara; Rohjai Badarudin; Liu Wei-Te

doi:10.26737/jetl.v9i2.5405

Feasibility Test of A Testing Station Trainer Situated in Virtual Reality Integrates Computational Thinking Concepts

Didik Hariyanto, Nurhening Yuniarti, Ilmawan Mustaqim, Amelia Fauziah Husna, Andik Asmara, Rohjai Badarudin, Liu Wei-Te

Abstract

This research focuses on integrating the Computational Thinking (CT) concept of automation system in vocational education to address the high costs and scarcity of educational resources in practical learning. The rapid industrial expansion of automation, particularly in Modular Production Systems (MPS), necessitates that students grasp both the components' functionalities and operational principles. Another point that needs to be considered is the integrated CT concept in the learning process. The CT for 21st-century skills, this research aims to facilitate knowledge absorption through systematic problem-solving strategies. To reduce cost and scarcity, this research developed an Interactive Virtual Reality Testing Station (IVRTS) employing a CT methodology to replicate MPS functions effectively in a Flexible Manufacturing System (FMS) Laboratory setting. Developing an Interactive Virtual Reality Testing Station (IVRTS) with a CT approach to simulate the working process is expected to overcome this problem in the Flexible Manufacturing System (FMS) Laboratory. The research procedure adopted from Lee Owens' ADDIE development procedure aims to create a CT-based IVRTS as an innovative educational tool. Experimental validation will compare the efficacy of CT-enhanced IVRTS against traditional methods among 36 students from higher schools. Based on the results of research on the IVRTS indicates its significant potential, receiving mainly "Good/Worth It" feedback. Despite the overall positive reception, users reported issues regarding its complex nature and the necessity for ongoing technical support. Refinements to make the system more intuitive and autonomous by streamlining the interface and clarifying functions are essential for broader user adoption.

Keywords

flexible manufacturing system; mps-testing station; interactive virtual reality; computational thinking; systematic problem-solving

Full Text:

PDF

References

Belyaev, V. P., & Shiyan, V. A. (2018). Multimedia Complex On The Principle Of Creating A Magnetic Field In An Asynchronous Electric Motor. System Analysis Applied Informatization in Science, (3), 63–69.

Bermúdez, A., Casado, R., Fernández, G., Guijarro, M., & Olivas, P. (2019). Drone challenge: A platform for promoting programming and robotics skills in K-12 education. International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems, 16(1), Article 1729881418820425.

Bers, M. U., Flannery, L., Kazakoff, E. R., & Sullivan, A. (2014). Computational thinking and tinkering: Exploration of an early childhood robotics curriculum. Computers & Education, 72, 145–157.

Bers, M. U., González-González, C., & Armas-Torres, M. (2019). Coding as a playground: Promoting positive learning experiences in childhood classrooms. Computers & Education, 138, 130–145.

Boom, K.-D., Bower, M., Siemon, J., & Arguel, A. (2022). Relationships between computational thinking and the quality of computer programs. Education and Information Technologies, Advance online publication.

Denning, P. J. (2017). Remaining trouble spots with computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 60(6), 33–39.

Haataja, E., Moreno-Esteva, E. G., Salonen, V., Laine, A., Toivanen, M., & Hannula, M. S. (2019). Teacher’s visual attention when scaffolding collaborative mathematical problem-solving. Teaching and Teacher Education, 86, Article 102877.

Herarsi, N. E. H., Mkedder, M. E. A., Hassam, A., & Meliani, S. M. (2021). Development of a supervisory and control interface for the distribution station of the FESTO MPS 500 system using WinCC software. In 2021 1st International Conference on Cyber Management and Engineering (CyMaEn), pp. 1–4.

Hsu, T.-C., Chang, S.-C., & Hung, Y.-T. (2018). How to learn and how to teach computational thinking: Suggestions based on a review of the literature. Computers & Education, 126, 296–310.

Israel-Fishelson, R., & Hershkovitz, A. (2022). Studying interrelations of computational thinking and creativity: A scoping review (2011-2020). Computers & Education, 176, Article 104353.

Kale, U., & Yuan, J. (2021). Still a new kid on the block? Computational thinking as problem solving in Code.org. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 59(4), 620–644.

Kemendikbud. (2020). Kemendikbud encourages technology-based learning [In Indonesian]. Retrieved from https://www.kemdikbud.go.id/main/blog/2020/02/kemendikbud-giatkan-pembelajaran-berbasis-teknologi

Negara, I. K. R. Y. (2017). The effect of animation in multimedia computer-based learning and learning style on the learning results. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 18(4), 177–190.

Kynigos, C., & Grizioti, M. (2018). Programming approaches to computational thinking: Integrating Turtle geometry, dynamic manipulation, and 3D space. Informatics in Education, 17(2), 321–340.

Parsazadeh, N., Cheng, P.-Y., Wu, T.-T., & Huang, Y.-M. (2021). Integrating computational thinking concept into digital storytelling to improve learners' motivation and performance. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 59(3), 470–495.

Sudira, P. (2016). TVET in the 21st century: Philosophy, theory, concepts, and teaching strategies. Yogyakarta: UNY Press.

Tang, K.-Y., Chou, T.-L., & Tsai, C.-C. (2020). A content analysis of computational thinking research: An international publication trends and research typology. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 29(1), 9–19.

Ulas, I. I., Haseski, H. I., & Tugtekin, U. (2018). Publication trends over 10 years of computational thinking research. Contemporary Educational Technology, 9(2), 131–153.

Wing, J. M. (2006). Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 33–35.

Wu, W.-R., & Yang, K.-L. (2022). The relationships between computational and mathematical thinking: A review study on tasks. Cogent Education, 9(1), Article 2098929.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26737/jetl.v9i2.5405

Refbacks

There are currently no refbacks.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Published by:

Institute of Managing and Publishing of Scientific Journals STKIP Singkawang

Sekolah Tinggi Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan (STKIP) Singkawang

Address : STKIP Singkawang, Jalan STKIP - Kelurahan Naram Singkawang, Kalimantan Barat, INDONESIA, 79251
No. Telp. : +62562 420 0344
No. Fax. : +62562 420 0584

JETL (Journal of Education, Teaching, and Learning)

e-ISSN : 2477-8478

p-ISSN : 2477-5924