Level of Creative Thinking Effect Through Multiple Solution Task Type Problem-Solving on Learning Outcomes

Muhammad Kris Yuan Hidayatulloh; Supari Muslim; Erina Rahmadyanti; Euis Ismayati; Nita Kusumawati

doi:10.26737/jetl.v5i1.1821

Level of Creative Thinking Effect Through Multiple Solution Task Type Problem-Solving on Learning Outcomes

Muhammad Kris Yuan Hidayatulloh, Supari Muslim, Erina Rahmadyanti, Euis Ismayati, Nita Kusumawati

Abstract

This study aims to: (1) analyze the level of creative thinking possessed by each class XI students of Building Drawing Technique (BDT); and (2) analyze the influence of the level of thinking on the learning outcomes of the cognitive, affective, and psychomotor domains. This type of research is correlational research through a quantitative approach method. The population in this study were all students in building expertise competencies at SMK Negeri 1 Nganjuk which included Geomatics and BDT. The sample used in this study was XI BDT class students. The instrument used in analyzing the level of creative thinking (LCT) is a problem-solving test sheet of the type of multiple solution tasks. The data analysis technique uses a linear regression test. The results of the study concluded that: (1) there were as many as 4 students included in the category of LCT 4 (very creative), there were 12 students included in the category of LCT 3 (creative), there are 11 students included in the category 2 LCT (quite creative), there are no students included in the category of LCT 1 (less creative), and there are as many as 11 students who included in the category of LCT 0 (not creative); (2) there is a significant influence between the level of creative thinking on the cognitive and psychomotor learning outcomes; and (3) there is a very significant influence between the level of creative thinking on the affective learning outcomes of class XI BDT students.

Keywords

Level of Creative Thinking; Simple Situation Map; Multiple Solution Task; Problem-Solving

Full Text:

PDF

References

Anonymous. (2019, May 20). Profil Program Keahlian Desain Pemodelan dan Informasi Bangunan. Retrieved from https://smkn1nganjuk. sch.id/teknik-gambar-bangunan.

Artmanda W, & Frista. (2015) Kamus besar lengkap bahasa Indonesia. Jombang: Lintas Media.

Bingolbali, E. (2011). Multiple Solutions to Problems in Teaching: Do Teachers Really Value Them? Australian Journal of Teacher Education. 36 (1),18-31.

Career Center Maine Department of Labor. (2004). Today’s work competence in maine. (Online), http://w ww.maine.gov/labor/lmis/pdf/Essential WorkCompetencies.pdf.

Colangelo, N., & Davis, G. (2011). The reference in gifted education. Translated by Saleh Abo-Gado & Mahmoud Abo-Gado, Riyadh: Obeikan Publishing.

Departemen Pendidikan Nasional. (2006). Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan. Jakarta: Depdiknas.

Gajda, A. (2016). The relationship between school achievement and creativity at diffrerent educational stages. Thingking Skill and Creativity. 19(1),246-259 doi.org/10.1016/ j.tsc. 2015.12.004

Hidayatulloh, & Suparji. (2015). Analisis tingkat Berpikir Kreatif Siswa kelas X TGB-1 pada Materi Pengukuran Luas Peta Situasi Melalui Pemecahan Masalah tipe Multiple Solution Task di SMK Negeri 1 Nganjuk. Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan Teknik Bangunan, 1(1), 122-128

Howard, J. (2002). A dual-state model of creative cognition for supporting strategies that foster creativity in the classroom. .International Journal of Technology and Design Education.12(1), 215–226.

Kuo, F., Chen, N., & Hwang, G. (2014). A creative thingking approach to enhancing the web based problem solving performance of university students. Computers and Education.72(1),220-230.doi.org/10.1016/ j.compedu.2013.11.005

Leikin, R. (2009). Exploring mathematical creativity using multiple solution tasks. Creativity in and the education of gifted students. 9(23), 129–145.

Muslim, S., et al. (2018). Development of Human Mechanic Interface Auotonics S070 Trainer for Electric Motor Installation Learning. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research (ASSEHR), volume 201 International Conference on Indonesian Technical Vocational Educa-tion and Association (APTEKINDO). Copyright © 2018, the Authors. Published by Atlantis Press. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC license (http://creativecommons.org/ licenses/ by-nc/4.0/).

Nami, Y., & Maral, A. (2014). The Relationship between Creativity and Academic Achievement. Procedia Social and behavior scinces.144(4),36-39. doi.org/10. 1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.652

Nur’aeni. (2008). Ada apa dengan Kreativitas. Cakrawala pendidikan. 7(3), 37-46.

Ridong, H., Xiaohui, S., & Chichjen, S. (2017). A Study on the Application of Creative Problem Solving Teaching to Statistics Teaching. EURASIA Journal of Mathe-matics Science and Technology Education. 13(7),3139-3149.doi:10.12973/eurasia. 2017.00708a

Silver, E. A. (1997). Fostering creativity through instruction rich in problem solving and problem posing. ZDM University of Pittsburgh. 3(12), 75-80,

Siswono, T.Y.E. (2008). Model pembelajaran matematika berbasis pengajuan dan pemecahan masalah untuk meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir kreatif. Surabaya: Unesa University Press.

Soeparno, & Muslim, S. (2018). Effectiveness of E-Learning for Students Vocational High School Building Engineering Program. IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering 336 (2018) 012039doi:10. 1088/1757-899X/336/1/012039.

Sudira, P. (2018). Metodologi pembelajaran vokasional abad XXI: Inovasi, teori dan praktis. Yogyakarta: UNY PressUndang-undang No.3 Tahun 2014 tentang perindustrian.

Thomas, M. (2005). Creative thinking and talking in residential care. therapeutic community.The International Journal for Therapeutic and Supportive Organizations. 26(1), 115-125.

Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st century skills: Learning for life in our times. San Fransisco: Wiley

Turkmen, H., & Sertkahya, M. (2015). Creative Thinking Skills Analyzes of Vocational High School Students. Journal of Education and Intructional Studies. 5(1).74-84.

Usman, A.S. dan Tasmin, R (2015). Entrepreneurial Skills Development Strategies through the Mandatory Students’ Industrial Work Experience Scheme in Nigeria.https://doi. org/10.1016/ j.sbspro .2015. 08.148.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26737/jetl.v5i1.1821

Refbacks

There are currently no refbacks.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Published by:

Institute of Managing and Publishing of Scientific Journals STKIP Singkawang

Sekolah Tinggi Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan (STKIP) Singkawang

Address : STKIP Singkawang, Jalan STKIP - Kelurahan Naram Singkawang, Kalimantan Barat, INDONESIA, 79251
No. Telp. : +62562 420 0344
No. Fax. : +62562 420 0584

JETL (Journal of Education, Teaching, and Learning)

e-ISSN : 2477-8478

p-ISSN : 2477-5924