Students’ Metacognition and Self-Regulated Learning: An Analysis Through Students’ Work in Solving HOTS Problem

Imas Ismayati; Nani Ratnaningsih; Supratman Supratman

doi:10.26737/jetl.v5i1.1328

Students’ Metacognition and Self-Regulated Learning: An Analysis Through Students’ Work in Solving HOTS Problem

Imas Ismayati, Nani Ratnaningsih, Supratman Supratman

Abstract

The aims of this study are to analyze and describe the metacognition of students who have high, moderate, and low Self-Regulated Learning (SLR) in solving Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) type problem. The research method that used was qualitative, research subjects were taken from students who can provide information about the results of their work to obtain complete data and stop when there was no information that can be extracted (saturated data), then obtained 6 people consisting of students who have high, medium, low SLR. The Data collection technique used was the think-aloud method. The data analysis technique used in this study was a model from Miles and Huberman. Based on the data analysis, it can be concluded that: the metacognition of students with high SLR used metacognition in the indicators to compose strategies and monitor actions to the maximum while at the evaluation stage they had not been able to mention other alternatives to solve the problem, the metacognition of students with medium SLR used metacognition to the maximum in the indicators of the stage of compiling strategies but at the monitoring actions they had not been able to interpret the results of the answers and at the stage of evaluation they had not been able to mention other alternatives to solve the problem, the metacognition of students with low SLR had not been able to use metacognition to the maximum. Teachers must pay attention to students' self-regulated learning and metacognition in solving HOTS problems.

Keywords

Metacognition; Higher Order Thinking Skills; Self-Regulated Learning

Full Text:

PDF

References

Alfiyah, N., & Siswono, T. Y. E. (2014). Identifikasi kesulitan metakognisi siswa dalam memecahkan masalah matematika. MATHEdunesa, 3(2), 131–138. Retrieved from https://jurnalmahasiswa.unesa.ac.id/index.php/mathedunesa

Amir, Z., & Risnawati. (2016). Psikologi pembelajaran matematika. Yogyakarta: Aswaja Pressindo.

Anggo, M. (2011). The metacognitive process of teacher college students in solving mathematical problem. Proceeding International Seminar and the Fourth National Conference on Mathematics Education Department of Mathematics Education Yogyakarta State University, 368–376. Yogyakarta.

Arifin, Z. (2017). Mengembangkan instrumen pengukur critical thinking skills siswa pada pembelajaran matematika abad 21. Jurnal Theorems (The Original Research of Mathematics), 1(2), 92–100. Retrieved from https://jurnal.unma.ac.id/index.php/th

Balk, F. M. A. (2010). The influence of metacognitive questions on the learning process during mathematical tasks in teacher-student conversations: A design study (Utrecht University). Retrieved from https://dspace.library.uu.nl/handle/1874/187079

Bulu, V. R., Budiyono, & Slamet, I. (2015). Kesulitan metakognisi siswa dalam memecahkan masalah matematika pada materi peluang ditinjau dari tipe kepribadian tipologi hippocrates – galenus kelas XI mia 1 SMA Negeri I SOE. Jurnal Elektronik Pembelajaran Matematika, 3(9), 970–984. Retrieved from http://www.jurnal.fkip.uns.ac.id/index.php/s2math

Desoete, A. (2007). Evaluating and improving the mathematics teaching-learning process through metacognition. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 5(3), 705–730.

Ernawati, E. (2016). Pengembangan perangkat pembelajaran matematika berbasis open-ended approach untuk mengembangkan HOTS siswa SMA. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 3(2), 209–220. Retrieved from https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/jrpm

Fitrianti, R. S., & Rizal, M. (2016). Analisis metakognisi siswa SMP Negeri 1 BUKO dalam memecahkan masalah matematika. Jurnal Mitra Sains, 4, 58–65.

Garrett, A. J., Mazzocco, M. M. M., & Baker, L. (2006). Development of the Metacognitive Skills of Prediction and Evaluation in Children With or Without Math Disability. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 21(2), 77–88. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5826.2006.00208.x

Kartika, D. L., Riyadi, R., & Sujadi, I. (2015). Proses metakognisi dalam pemecahan masalah matematika pada siswa kelas XI di SMA Negeri Banyumas. Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika, 3(9), 1021–1034. Retrieved from https://jurnal.fkip.uns.ac.id/index.php/s2math

Kosasih, N. Z., Supratman, S., & Hermanto, R. (2018). Analisis kesalahan peserta didik dalam menyelesaikan soal pemecahan masalah pada materi aljabar berdasarkan teori Jean Piaget (Penelitian pada peserta didik kelas VIII SMP Islam Al-Azhar 30 Kota Tasikmalaya). JP3M (Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran Matematika), 4(1), 35–46. Retrieved from http://jurnal.unsil.ac.id/index.php/jp3m/article/view/NAD41/435

Murtadho, F. (2013). Berpikir kritis dan strategi metakognisi: Alternatif sarana pengoptimalan latihan menulis argumentasi. 2nd Internasional Seminar on Quality and Affordable Education, 530–541. Johor: University Technology Malaysia.

Ormrod, J. E. (2008). Psikologi pendidikan (6th ed.; Indianti, Trans.). Jakarta: Erlangga.

Özsoy, G., & Ataman, A. (2017). The effect of metacognitive strategy training on mathematical problem solving achievement. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 1(2), 67–82.

Panaoura, A., & Philippou, G. (2007). The developmental change of young pupils’ metacognitive ability in mathematics in relation to their cognitive abilities. Cognitive Development, 22(2), 149–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COGDEV.2006.08.004

Pulmones, R. (2007). Learning chemistry in a metacognitive environment. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 16(2), 165–183. Retrieved from https://ejournals.ph/issue.php?id=373#prod

Ratnaningsih, N., Akbar, R. R. El, & Hidayat, E. (2018). Effect of chronotype and student learning time on mathematical ability based on self-regulated learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1013, 12141. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1013/1/012141

Risnanosanti. (2008). Kemampuan metakognitif siswa dalam pembelajaran matematika. Pythagoras: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 4(1), 86–98. https://doi.org/10.21831/pg.v4i1.690

Schraw, G., Crippen, K. J., & Hartley, K. (2006). Promoting Self-Regulation in Science Education: Metacognition as Part of a Broader Perspective on Learning. Research in Science Education, 36(1–2), 111–139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-005-3917-8

Someren, M. W. V., Barnard, Y. F., & Sandberg, J. A. C. (1994). The think-aloud method: A practical approach to modelling cognitive. London: Academic Press.

Sugiyono. (2017). Metode penelitian kualitatif. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Thomas, A., & Thorne, G. (2009). How to increase higher order thinking. Retrieved from http://www.studentachievement.org/wp-content/uploads/How_to_Increase_HOT.doc

Winne, P. H., & Perry, N. E. (2000). Measuring self-regulated learning. Handbook of Self-Regulation, 531–566. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012109890-2/50045-7

Zimmerman, B. J. (1990). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview. Educational Psychologist, 25(1), 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2501_2

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26737/jetl.v5i1.1328

Refbacks

There are currently no refbacks.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Published by:

Institute of Managing and Publishing of Scientific Journals STKIP Singkawang

Sekolah Tinggi Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan (STKIP) Singkawang

Address : STKIP Singkawang, Jalan STKIP - Kelurahan Naram Singkawang, Kalimantan Barat, INDONESIA, 79251
No. Telp. : +62562 420 0344
No. Fax. : +62562 420 0584

JETL (Journal of Education, Teaching, and Learning)

e-ISSN : 2477-8478

p-ISSN : 2477-5924