Moralitas, Keberterimaan, Pendidikan Karakter, HOTS, dan Kelayakan Bahan dalam Pembelajaran Sastra

Dipa Nugraha

Abstract


Artikel ini bertujuan membahas beberapa isu dalam pembelajaran sastra yang terkait dengan moralitas, keberterimaan, pendidikan atau pembentukan karakter, HOTS, dan kelayakan karya sastra. Metode penelitian  kajian literatur dipergunakan di dalam membandingkan dan mengintegrasikan teori, hasil penelitian, dan pendapat ahli berkenaan dengan pembelajaran sastra dan isu yang relevan di dalam tujuan penelitian. Sumber data berasal dari buku, artikel penelitian, dan tulisan ahli di dalam pembelajaran sastra. Dari pembahasan dan analisis, ditemukan bahwa keterkaitan moralitas dan karya sastra di dalam pembelajaran sastra adalah unik. Ia menempatkan guru sebagai penanggung jawab dengan segala risikonya. Karya sastra memiliki potensi di dalam pendidikan karakter dan HOTS dengan kehadiran guru sebagai fasilitator dan pendamping. Hal lainnya yang menjadi bahasan di dalam artikel ini adalah mengenai isu kelayakan sebuah karya sastra sebagai bahan pembelajaran sastra yang tidak bisa melepaskan diri dari isu penjenjangan karya sastra menurut tahapan usia pebelajar dan kelayakan karya sastra di dalam memenuhi ekspektasi kurikulum dan diskursus kesastraan nasional.

Keywords


Literature Learning; Education; Character Education

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abend-David, D. (2006). Sweet and Functional. Bridges, 11(2), 158–161.

Agee, J. (2000). What is effective literature instruction? A study of experienced high school English teachers in differing grade-and ability-level classes. Journal of Literacy Research, 32(3), 303–348.

Alisjahbana, S. T. (1977). Kedudukan dan Kewajiban Pujangga. In Perjuangan Tanggung Jawab dalam Kesusasteraan (pp. 61–67). Jakarta: Pustaka Jaya.

Ansari, K. (2018). Penilaian Pembelajaran Sastra Indonesia Berketerampilan Pikir Taraf Tinggi (HOTS). Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia I, 21–34. Medan: Unimed.

Antoro, B. (2017). Gerakan Literasi Sekolah: Dari Pucuk Hingga Akar, Sebuah Refleksi. Jakarta: Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah, Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.

Arias, I. J. (2007). Selecting reading materials wisely. Letras, (41), 131–151.

Ariyana, Y., Pudjiastuti, A., Bestary, R., & Zamroni. (2018). Buku Pegangan Pembelajaran Berorientasi pada Keterampilan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi. Jakarta: Direktorat Jenderal Guru dan Tenaga Kependidikan Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.

Aston, R. (2020). The Role of the Literary Canon in the Teaching of Literature. New York & Oxon: Taylor & Francis.

Astutik, P. P. (2016). Integrasi Penguatan Pendidikan Karakter (PPK) Dan Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) dalam Pembelajaran Tematik SD. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan FIP UNM, 343–354. Malang: Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas negeri Malang.

Baratz, L., & Reingold, R. (2010). The Ideological Dilemma in Teaching Literature: Moral Conflicts in a Diversified Society: An Israeli Teacher Case Study. Current Issues in Education, 13(3), n3.

Bintz, W. P. (2018). The Literary Canon: Virtue, Vice, or Both. The Journal of Balanced Literacy Research and Instruction, 4(1), 5.

Bixler, P. (1981). Didacticism and Morality in the Novel and Children’s Literature. Children’s Literature Association Quarterly, 6(1), 19–22.

Bohlin, K. (2005). Teaching character education through literature: Awakening the moral imagination in secondary classrooms. New York: Routledge.

Boyd, F. B., & Bailey, N. M. (2009). Censorship in three metaphors. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 52(8), 653–661.

Budiman, M. (2012). Meninjau kembali hubungan antara sastra dan budi pekerti. Jurnal Pendidikan Karakter, (2).

Cox, L. (2009). Faith and Literature: A Look at Book Censorship (Ouachita Baptist University). Retrieved from https://scholarlycommons.obu.edu/honors_theses/238

Darnton, R. (2014). Censors at Work: How States Shaped Literature. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.

Doyle, R. P. (2015). Books Challenged or Banned 2014-2015. Chicago: American Library Association.

Duthie, F. (2010). Libraries and the Ethics of Censorship. The Australian Library Journal, 59(3), 85–94.

Eco, U. (1990). Interpretation and overinterpretation: world, history, texts. The Tanner Lectures on Human Values. Retrieved from https://tannerlectures.utah.edu/_documents/a-to-z/e/Eco_91.pdf

Eldridge, R., & Cohen, T. (2009). Literature and Morality. In The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy and Literature. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195182637.003.0022

Fizriyani, W. (2014). Peranan Sastra Indonesia dalam Membangun Keragaman Budaya: Perspektif Sejarah. Jurnal Dialektika, 1(1), 131–148.

Gillespie, T. (2010). Doing Literary Criticism: Helping Students Engage with Challenging Texts. New Hampshire: Stenhouse Publishers.

Gillespie, Tim. (1994). Why literature matters. The English Journal, 83(8), 16–21.

Goldmann, L. (1980). Essays on Method in the Sociology of Literature. St. Louis, MO: Telos Press.

Hyman, L. W. (1984). Morality and literature—The necessary conflict. The British Journal of Aesthetics, 24(2), 149–155.

Johnson, J. (2014). The success of character education in relation to religion in a public school district. Liberty University.

Kanzunnudin, M. (2012). Peran sastra dalam pendidikan karakter. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan: Pendidikan Untuk Kejayaan Bangsa, 195–204. Penerbit Universitas Sanata Dharma.

Kennedy, G. A., Brooks, P., Press, C. U., Norton, G. P., Osborn, J., Nisbet, H. B., … Minnis, A. J. (2001). The Cambridge History of Literary Criticism: Volume 3, The Renaissance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kosasih, E. (2013). Sastra klasik sebagai wahana efektif dalam pengembangan pendidikan karakter. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra, 13(2), 225–236.

Lapsley, D. K., & Narvaez, D. (2007). Character education. Handbook of Child Psychology, 4.

Larsson, G. (2014). Literary canon use within Swedish EFL teaching (pp. 1–18). pp. 1–18. Göteborgs: Göteborgs universitet.

Lickona, T. (1996). Eleven principles of effective character education. Journal of Moral Education, 25(1), 93–100.

Lickona, T. (1997). The teacher’s role in character education. Journal of Education, 179(2), 63–80.

Lickona, T. (1999). Religion and character education. Phi Delta Kappan, 81(1), 21.

Lombardi, E. (2019). Controversial and Banned Books: Why These Controversial Novels Were Censored and Banned. Retrieved from https://www.thoughtco.com/controversial-and-banned-books-738746

Lumpkin, A. (2008). Teachers as Role Models Teaching Character and Moral Virtues. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 79(2), 45–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/07303084.2008.10598134

Lundberg, V. (2008). Censorship and literature: a brief look at censorship using Marquis De Sade’s 120 Days of Sodom as a model. Lulea University of Technology.

Mar, R. A., & Oatley, K. (2008). The Function of Fiction is the Abstraction and Simulation of Social Experience. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(3), 173–192. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6924.2008.00073.x

Miner, R. (1990). Comparative Poetics: An Intercultural Essay on Theories of Literature. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

Moody, H. L. B. (1979). The teaching of literature with special reference to developing countries. London: Longman.

Naval, C., Carmen, M., & Bernal, A. (2015). Character Education: International Perspectives. Pedagogia e Vita, 73, 155–184.

Novianti, N. (2017). Teaching Character Education to College Students Using Bildungsromans. International Journal of Instruction, 10(4), 255–272.

Nurgiyantoro, B., & Efendi, A. (2013). Prioritas Penentuan Nilai Pendidikan Karakter dalam Pembelajaran Sastra Remaja. Cakrawala Pendidikan, XXXII(3), 382–393.

Ollmann, H. E. (1996). Creating higher level thinking with reading response. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 39(7), 576–581.

Pantić, N. (2006). Moral education through literature. Zbornik Instituta Za Pedagoska Istrazivanja, 38(2), 401–414.

Pantić, N., & Wubbels, T. (2012). The role of teachers in inculcating moral values: operationalisation of concepts. Journal of Beliefs & Values, 33(1), 55–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/13617672.2012.650030

Said, E. W. (1999, January 28). Literature and literalism. Al-Ahram Weekly.

Schaper, E. (1968). Aristotle’s catharsis and aesthetic pleasure. The Philosophical Quarterly (1950-), 18(71), 131–143.

Schuitema, J., Dam, G. ten, & Veugelers, W. (2008). Teaching strategies for moral education: A review. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 40(1), 69–89.

Slamet, Y. B. M. (2018). Fungsi dan Peran Karya Sastra dari Masa ke Masa. Jurnal PRAXIS, 1(1), 24–40.

Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039

Steiner, J. (2014). The Literature Program (pp. 1–16). pp. 1–16. Retrieved from https://gifted.cet.ac.il/CETHandler....

Subadar. (2017). Penguatan Pendidikan Karakter (Ppk) Berbasis Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS). PEDAGOGIK: Jurnal Pendidikan, 4(1), 81–93.

Sullivan, J. P., & de Jong, I. J. F. (2018). Modern Critical Theory and Classical Literature. Leiden, New York, Koln: Brill.

Sulton, A. (2015). Sastra “bacaan liar” harapan menuju kemerdekaan. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra, 15(2), 213–227.

Suyitno. (2017). Saman and Atas Nama Cinta in the View of Canonisation of Literature. International Journal for Historical Studies, 9(1), 81–94.

Suyitno, & Nugraha, D. (2014). Canonization of four Indonesian contemporary novels written in the 21st century: Questioning public recognition and acceptance towards the ideas of feminism. Journal of Language and Literature, 5(1), 33–40.

Teeuw, A. (2013). Modern Indonesian literature. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.

Torraco, R. J. (2005). Writing integrative literature reviews: Guidelines and examples. Human Resource Development Review, 4(3), 356–367.

Trianton, T. (2019). Sastra, Hoax, dan Kritik yang HOTS. Hoaks, Literasi Sastra, Dan Kedewasaan Berpolitik, 1–7. Banyumas: HISKI Komisariat Banyumas.

van Ginkel, A. (2008). Educational Values and Material Development. SIL Forum for Language Fieldwork, 2008–004, 1–5.

Walsh, C. A. (1930). Literature and morals. Australasian Journal of Psychology and Philosophy, 8(3), 161–167. https://doi.org/10.1080/00048403008541309

Webster, J., & Watson, R. T. (2002). Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: Writing a literature review. MIS Quarterly, xiii–xxiii.

Wicaksono, A. (2017). Pengkajian Prosa Fiksi (edisi revisi). Yogyakarta: Penerbit Garudhawaca.

Widyahening, S., & Wardhani, N. E. (2016). Literary works and character education. International Journal of Language and Literature, 4(1), 176–180.

Yanti, C. S. (2017). Religiositas Islam Dalam Novel Ratu Yang Bersujud Karya Amrizal Mochamad Mahdavi. Jurnal Humanika, 3(15).

Yusuf, I. A., Adiputra, W. M., Masduki, Rianto, P., & Zuhri, S. (2010). Pelarangan Buku di Indonesia: Sebuah Paradoks Demokrasi dan Kebebasan Berekspresi. Yogyakarta: Pemantau Regulasi dan Regulator Media (PR2Media) dan Friedrich Ebert Stiftung (FES).

Zurqoni, Retnawati, H., Arlinwibowo, J., & Apino, E. (2018). Strategy and implementation of character education in senior high schools and vocational high schools. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 9(3), 370–397.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26737/jp-bsi.v5i2.1843

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Published by:

Institute of Managing and Publishing of Scientific Journals STKIP Singkawang

e-ISSN: 2477-846X 

p-ISSN: 2477-5932

Sekolah Tinggi Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan (STKIP) Singkawang

Address : STKIP Singkawang, Jalan STKIP - Kelurahan Naram Singkawang, Kalimantan Barat, INDONESIA, 79251
No. Telp.   : +62562 420 0344
No. Fax.    : +62562 420 0342

Editor in Chief: [email protected] / Wa: +6281256252769

Coordinator: [email protected] / [email protected] / Wa: +6282142072788

Management Tools

     

JP-BSI Indexed by:

          

Creative Commons License

JP-BSI (Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.