Assessment Practices in The Implementation of the Merdeka Curriculum in Elementary Education: An Observation Study at SDN 7 Panarung

Angger Dimas Ona Giri; Aprizal Kumaunang; Aril Arista; Khusna Khusna; Mariani Mariani; Michael Alfa Febrian; Muhammad Ahyadi; Sapar Alamsyah; Laila Rahmawati

doi:10.26737/jerr.v7i2.8826

Assessment Practices in The Implementation of the Merdeka Curriculum in Elementary Education: An Observation Study at SDN 7 Panarung

Angger Dimas Ona Giri, Aprizal Kumaunang, Aril Arista, Khusna Khusna, Mariani Mariani, Michael Alfa Febrian, Muhammad Ahyadi, Sapar Alamsyah, Laila Rahmawati

Abstract

The Independent Curriculum implementation requires a paradigm shift in learning assessment practices from outcome-oriented approaches toward assessment supporting continuous, student-centered learning. Assessment should function not only as a measurement tool but also as a foundation for pedagogical decision-making. However, empirical evidence regarding elementary school assessment practices within the Independent Curriculum context remains limited. This study examined learning assessment practices in Independent Curriculum implementation at SDN 7 Panarung, focusing on diagnostic, formative, and summative assessments, and the utilization of assessment results for instructional improvement. This qualitative descriptive observational study involved 12 classroom teachers (grades 1-6), students, and the school principal. Data were collected through participant observation, semi-structured interviews, and document analysis, then analyzed using triangulation techniques. Findings indicated that teachers implemented diagnostic, formative, and summative assessments aligned with Independent Curriculum principles. Formative assessment constituted the most prevalent practice, primarily through oral questioning, classroom observation, and daily assignments. However, feedback quality was generally generic rather than specific and constructive. Summative assessment employed various instruments, though written tests remained predominant and higher-order thinking skills assessment was not yet optimized. Assessment results informed remedial and enrichment activities, but implementation lacked systematic documentation. The study concluded that assessment practices at SDN 7 Panarung demonstrated general alignment with Independent Curriculum frameworks. However, continuous professional development, strengthened institutional support, and systematic assessment data utilization are recommended for enhanced implementation quality

Keywords

Learning assessment; Merdeka Curriculum; Elementary School; Formative Assesment; Assesment Literacy

Full Text:

PDF

References

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2018). Classroom assessment and pedagogy. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 25(6), 551–575. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2018.1441807

Brookhart, S. M. (2015). Assessment as a learning process: How classroom assessment promotes learning. In International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed., pp. 551–555). Elsevier

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

DeLuca, C., LaPointe-McEwan, D., & Luhanga, U. (2016). Teacher assessment literacy: A review of international trends and perspectives. Canadian Journal of Education, 39(2), 1-34.

Heritage, M. (2018). Assessment for learning as support for student self-regulation. The Australian Educational Researcher, 45(1), 51-63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-018-0261-3

Ikhsan, M., Suryadi, D., & Nurlaelah, E. (2017). The implementation of formative assessment in mathematics learning: A case study in Indonesian elementary school. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 895, 012062. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/895/1/012062

McMillan, J. H., Venable, J. C., & Varier, D. (2013). Studies of the effect of formative assessment on student achievement: So much more is needed. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 18(1), 1-15.

Panadero, E., Jonsson, A., & Botella, J. (2017). Effects of self-assessment on self-regulated learning and self-efficacy: Four meta-analyses. Educational Research Review, 22, 74-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2017.08.004

Rahayu, R., Rosita, R., Rahayuningsih, Y. S., Hernawan, A. H., & Prihantini. (2022). Implementasi Kurikulum Merdeka Belajar di sekolah penggerak. Jurnal Basicedu, 6(4), 6313-6319. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v6i4.3237

Rahmawati, L., Bungai, J., & Femmy, F. (2022). The Development of HOTS Oriented Student Worksheet With the TPACK Approach in Elementary School in The Watershed Environment. Tunas: Jurnal Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, 8(1), 11–17. https://doi.org/10.33084/tunas.v8i1.4222

Sugiyono. (2019). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta,

Suryaman, M. (2020). Orientasi pengembangan kurikulum merdeka belajar. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra, 1(1), 13-28.

Widiastuti, Y. M. S., & Saksono, H. (2023). Asesmen pembelajaran pada Kurikulum Merdeka: Tantangan dan peluang. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar, 14(1), 45-58.

Wiliam, D. (2017). Embedded formative assessment: Practical techniques for K-12 classrooms (2nd ed.). Solution Tree Press.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26737/jerr.v7i2.8826

Refbacks

There are currently no refbacks.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Publisher:

Institute of Managing and Publishing of Scientific Journals STKIP Singkawang

Address : STKIP Singkawang, Jalan STKIP - Kelurahan Naram, Singkawang, Kalimantan Barat, INDONESIA, 79251
No. Telp. : +62562 420 0344
No. Fax. : +62562 420 0584

Journal of Educational Review and Research

e-ISSN : 2597-9760

p-ISSN : 2597-9752