Measurement of Audit Opinion in Supervisory Apparatus Capability and Maturity of the Government Internal Control System

Amelia Kontesa; Fikry Karim; Rahma Masdar; Masruddin Masruddin

doi:10.26737/ij-mds.v8i2.7618

Measurement of Audit Opinion in Supervisory Apparatus Capability and Maturity of the Government Internal Control System

Amelia Kontesa, Fikry Karim, Rahma Masdar, Masruddin Masruddin

Abstract

This study aims to measure audit opinion based on the capability of the government's internal control apparatus and the maturity of the government's internal control system. The test used SEM-PLS with data obtained from 34 provinces in Indonesia during the period 2018 to 2022, with a total of 1,295 data observations. This study used a quantitative approach with an explanatory research type. Data was collected through secondary documentation via official reports on APIP capability evaluations, SPIP maturity, and audit opinions published by BPKP and BPK for all local governments in Indonesia. Data collection techniques were carried out through documentation from the official websites of the relevant institutions. The data analysis technique used in this study was Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM) with the help of SmartPLS software. Tests were conducted on the outer model, inner model, and significance tests through resampling (bootstrapping) to determine the relationship between variables. The study found that specifically capability had a basis in consideration of giving an audit opinion that falls into the ‘weak’ category. However, the maturity of the government's internal control system had a linear basis that was classified as ‘moderate’. Thus, it is important to pay attention to the apparatus in improving the quality and capability in reducing the risk of possible irregularities and ensuring that the implementation of governance principles leads to good governance. These findings support the development of the quality of governance in government financial audit.

Keywords

Audit Opinion; Apparatus Capability; Good Governance; Government Internal Control System; Maturity of Government Internal Control System

Full Text:

PDF

References

Ageng, Y. R., & Usman, F. (2023). Pengaruh Kapabilitas Aparat Pengawasan Intern Pemerintah (APIP) Dan Maturitas Sistem Pengendalian Intern Pemerintah (SPIP) Terhadap Opini Audit. Jurnalku, 3(4), 390–401.

Anggriani, C. S., Abdullah, M. I., Jurana, J., Ridwan, R., Ansar, M., & Yusuf, R. M. (2025). Nusantara bebas korupsi: Kritik atas zona integritas ala Tombolotutu. Jurnal Akuntansi Multiparadigma, 15(3), 444-459.

Ansar, M., Irianto, G., & Jurana, N. S. (2023). Refleksi yin dan yang sebagai teropong perseptif audit berkualitas. Malang: Peneleh.

Aqsha, M., Ansar, M., & Bawias, H. H. B. (2025). Audit Judgement In Task Complexity, Self Efficacy, and Auditor Professional Skepticism. JIBEMA: Jurnal Ilmu Bisnis, Ekonomi, Manajemen, Dan Akuntansi, 2(4), 220–233.

Asaolu, T. O., Adedokun, S. A., & Monday, J. U. (2016). Promoting good governance through internal audit function (IAF): The Nigerian experience. International Business Research, 9(5), 196-204. https://doi.org/10.5539/ibr.v9n5p196

Badan Pengawasan Keuangan Pemerintah (BPKP). (2021). Peraturan Kepala BPKP Nomor 8 Tahun 2021 tentang Penilaian Kapabilitas Aparat Pengawasan Intern Pemerintah.

Bendickson, J., Muldoon, J., Liguori, E., & Davis, P. E. (2016). Agency theory: the times, they are a-changin’. Management Decision, 54(1), 174–193. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-02-2015-0058

Boufounou, P., Eriotis, N., Kounadeas, T., Argyropoulos, P., & Poulopoulos, J. (2024). Enhancing Internal Control Mechanisms in Local Government Organizations: A Crucial Step towards Mitigating Corruption and Ensuring Economic Development. Economies, 12(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/economies12040078

Cahyana, P. G., & Suprasto, H. B. (2023). Akuntabilitas Pengelolaan Dana Desa. E-Jurnal Akuntansi, 33(2), 556. https://doi.org/10.24843/eja.2023.v33.i02.p19

Christensen, C. M., Raynor, M. E., Rory, M., & McDonald, R. (2015). What is disruptive innovation? Harvard Business Review, 93(12), 44–53. https://hbr.org/2015/12/what-is-disruptive-innovation

Diana, M., Pruyudo, B., & Rukhviyanti, N. (2023). Evaluating Financial Statement Presentation Compliance And Auditor Opinion Based On BPK-RI Examination: A Case Study In West Java Local Governments. Jurnal Audit, Pajak, Akuntansi Publik (AJIB), 2(1), 36-44. https://doi.org/10.32897/ajib.2023.2.1.2870

Harimurti, A. J., & Iskak, J. (2023). Factors Affecting BPK Audit Findings on Local Government Financial Reports In West Sulawesi Province For The Period 2020 to 2022. 2022. Return: Study of Management, Economic and Bussines, 2(11), 1126-1141.

Hilal, F., Irawan, R. A. I., & Nurhaliza, N. (2024). Peran audit internal (APIP) dalam meningkatkan efektivitas pengawasan dan pencegahan korupsi di Indonesia. Jurnal Sosial Humaniora Sigli, 7(2).

Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics. Journal of Financial Economics, 4, 305–360.

Kementrian Dalam Negeri. (2018). Peraturan Menteri Dalam Negeri Nomor 4 Tahun 2018 tentang Pelaksanaan Reviu atas Laporan Keuangan Pemerintah daerah berbasis Aktual.

Kock, N. (2015). Common Method Bias in PLS-SEM: A Full Collinearity Assessment Approach. International Journal of e-Collaboration, 11(4), 1-10.

Komite Standar Akuntansi Pemerintahan. (2010). Standar Akuntansi Pemerintahan. Komite Standar Akuntansi Pemerintahan, 71, 160–173. https://www.ksap.org/sap/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Buku-SAP-2021-1.pdf

Latan, H., & Ghozali,I. (2014). Partial Least Square: Concepts, Techniques, and Applications SmartPls 2.0. Semarang: Diponegoro University Press.

Mukhlis, M., Sumirah, S., & Prahesta, A. L. (2021). Evaluation on Maturity Assessment System of Government Internal Control System (SPIP) in Local Government. Jurnal Akuntansi, Ekonomi dan Manajemen Bisnis, 9(1), 94–102. https://doi.org/10.30871/jaemb.v9i1.2924

Oprea, O., Hoinaru, R., Păcuraru-Ionescu, C.-P., & Neamţu, D. (2022). Accounting for the future: practice, Artificial Intelligence and regulation. Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, 16(1), 817–826. https://doi.org/10.2478/picbe-2022-0076

Panda, B., & Leepsa, N. M. (2017). Agency theory: Review of theory and evidence on problems and perspectives. Indian Journal of Corporate Governance, 10(1), 74–95. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0974686217701467

Paranoan, S., Herawati, T., Yanuarisa, Y., Kantohe, M. S. S., Usman, E., Priliandani, N. M. I., Handayani, M., Yamin, N. Y., Martiningsih, R. S. P., & Arif, M. (2022). Akuntabilitas Kinerja Sektor Publik. Media Sains Indonesia.

Permatasari, P., Ilman, A. S., Tilt, C. A., Lestari, D., Islam, S., Tenrini, R. H., Rahman, A. B., Samosir, A. P., & Wardhana, I. W. (2021). The village fund program in Indonesia: Measuring the effectiveness and alignment to sustainable development goals. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(21). https://doi.org/10.3390/su132112294

Pratiwi, K. I., Rosdini, D., & Fitriyah, F. (2020). . Pengaruh gaya kepemimpinan transformasional, sistem pengendalian intern, dan tingkat kapabilitas auditor internal pemerintah (APIP) terhadap pencegahan fraud. Jurnal Inovasi, Kreativitas dan Perubahan, 10(11), 705–726.

Presiden RI. (2008). Peraturan Presiden Republik Indonesia Nomor 60 Tahun 2008 tentang Sistem Pengendalian Intern Pemerintah.

Presiden RI. (2014). Instruksi Presiden Republik Indonesia Nomor 9 Tahun 2014 tentang Peningkatan Kualitas Sistem Pengendalian Intern dan Keandalan Penyelenggaraan Fungsi Pengawasan Internal.

Presiden RI. (2019). Peraturan Presiden Nomor 12 Tahun 2019 tentang Pengelolaan Keuangan Daerah.

Putri, P. P. S., Damayanti, R., & Hapsari, A. N. S. (2022). Village Fund Allocation Practice: The Investigation of Accountability and Transparency. Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi, 6(2), 455. https://doi.org/10.23887/jia.v6i2.40390

Salma, D. K. (2022). Masa Depan Peran Audit Internal Di Indonesia. Jurnal Akuntansi Multiparadigma, 13(2), 277–293. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jamal.2022.13.2.21

Sari, R., Muslim, M., & Sari, M. M. (2021). The Role of Internal Control System on Characteristics of Village Financial Reports. Jurnal Akuntansi, 25(2), 239–255. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24912/ja.v25i2.808

Stowell, N. F., Pacini, C., Wadlinger, N., Crain, J., & Schmidt, M. (2020). Investigating Healthcare Fraud: Its Scope, Applicable Laws, and Regulations. William & Mary Business Law Review, 11(2), 479.

Sugiharti, C. A., & Hariani, S. (2021). Dampak Akuntabilitas, Transparansi dan Pengawasan Terhadap Pengelolaan Dana Desa. Jurnal Riset Manajemen dan Bisnis, 6(1), 11–18. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.36407/jrmb.v6i1.315

Sugiyono. (2016). Educational Research Methods: Quantitative, Qualitative and R&D Approaches. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sugiyono. (2017). Quantitative, Qualitative, and R&D Research Methods. Bandung: Alfabeta.

UU RI. (2004a). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 1 Tahun 2004 tentang Perbendaharaan Negara.

UU RI. (2004b). Undang-Undang Nomor 15 Tahun 2004 tentang Pemeriksaan Pengelolaan dan Tanggung Jawab Keuangan Negara.

Wahyuandari, W., Ratnawati, T., & Riyadi, S. (2022). Effect of Regulation, Accountability Systems, Accounting Principles, Priority Programs on Performance Accountability and Performance Reporting Moderates of Good Financial Governance of Village. International Research Journal of Management, IT and Social Sciences, 9(1), 159–167. https://doi.org/10.21744/irjmis.v9n1.2035

Widiantari, N. N. A., & Yuliantari, N. P. Y. (2023). Effectiveness of Implementing the Village Financial System in Increasing the Accountability of Village Financial Reports. Management and Applied Social Studies Review, 1(2), 79–87. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.32795/massiv.v1i2.5031

Widyaningsih, A. (2016). Internal control system on the quality of financial statement information and financial accountability in primary schools in Bandung, Indonesia. Research Journal of Finance and Accounting, 7(10), 10–16.

Wulandari, I., & Bandi, B. (2015). Pengaruh E-Government, Kapabilitas Apip Dan Persentasi Penyelesaian Tindak Lanjut Terhadap Opini Audit Laporan Keuangan Pemerintah Daerah di Indonesia. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Bisnis, 15(2), 148.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26737/ij-mds.v8i2.7618

Refbacks

There are currently no refbacks.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Publisher:

Institute of Managing and Publishing of Scientific Journals, STKIP Singkawang

Address : STKIP Singkawang, Jalan STKIP - Kelurahan Naram, Singkawang, Kalimantan Barat, INDONESIA, 79251
No. Telp. : +62562 420 0344
No. Fax. : +62562 420 0584

International Journal of Multi Disipline Science

e-ISSN : 2615-1707