Re-Understanding the Problem of Induction in Empirical Science

Rumiari Rumiari; Hardika Hardika; Ahmad Ahmad

doi:10.26737/ij-mds.v7i1.4879

Re-Understanding the Problem of Induction in Empirical Science

Rumiari Rumiari, Hardika Hardika, Ahmad Ahmad

Abstract

A problem is a statement or truth based on experience that is used as a hypothesis. In formulating a hypothesis based on statements as an inductive way of thinking. The problem of induction can also be formulated as a question about the validity or truth of universal statements based on experience. Thinking based on logic gives humans the possibility to gain knowledge, which is deeper than the meaning of what is thought. In formulating a hypothesis based on statements as an inductive way of thinking. The problem of induction can also be formulated as a question about the validity or truth of universal statements based on experience. In the case of inductive logic, however, these relationships vary in strength, measures of conditional probability reflect the degree of rational confidence that a person should have in the hypothesis that empirical science should be so characterized by its methods. With this method, we deal with science with a system based on what we do to what is done. The difference between the psychological view of knowledge which is related to empirical facts, and the logic of knowledge which is only related to empirical facts. With logical connections, the belief in inductive logic is largely due to confusion between psychological problems and epistemological problems.

Keywords

Problems of Induction; Empirical Science; Logic of Knowledge

Full Text:

PDF

References

Albert, D. et al. (1999). Knowledge Spaces: Theories, Empirical Research, and Applications. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Azzouni, J. (2000). Knowledge And Reference in Empirical Science. New York: Routledge.

Bonjour, L. (1985). The Structure of Empirical Knowledge. United States of America: Harvard University Press.

Creath, R. (2012). Rudolf Carnap and the Legacy of Logical Empiricism. New York and London: Springer Dordrecht Heidelberg.

Etis, N. (2019). Buku Ajar Mata Kuliah Filsafat Ilmu. Sidoarjo: Umsida Press.

Fadli, A. M. D., Wahyuddin, M. H., & Arfah, J. (2022). Filsafat ilmu dan logika. Yogyakarta: Budi Utama.

Giere, R. N. & Richardson, A. W. (1996). Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science. London: University Of Minnesota Press.

Hakim, L. (2020). Filsafat Ilmu dan logika: Dialektika Perubahan. Klaten: Lakeisha.

Harianto, B. (2023). Diktat Filsafat Ilmu. Medan.

Holyoak, K. J. & Morrison, R. G. (2005). The Cambridge Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Lewis, C. I. (2007). The Given Element in Empirical Knowledge. The Philosophical Review, 61(2).

Popper, K. (2002). The Logic of Scientific Discovery. London and New York: Routledge Classics.

Prawitz, D., Skyrms, B., & Westerstahl, D. (1994). Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science IX. Netherlands: Elsevier Science B.V.

Richardson, A. & Ueebel, T. (2007). The Cambridge Companion to Logical Empiricism. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Rootselaar. B. V. & Staa, J. F. (1968). Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science 111. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company.

Syafithri, F. N. et al. (2023). Empirisme dan Fenomenologis dalam Perspektif Filsafat Hukum Naturalism. Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Humaniora, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.58578/ahkam.v2i2.11 00

Utama, I. G. B. R. (2021). Filsafat dan Logika Manajemen dan Pariwisata. Yogyakarta: Budi Utama.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26737/ij-mds.v7i1.4879

Refbacks

There are currently no refbacks.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Publisher:

Institute of Managing and Publishing of Scientific Journals, STKIP Singkawang

Address : STKIP Singkawang, Jalan STKIP - Kelurahan Naram, Singkawang, Kalimantan Barat, INDONESIA, 79251
No. Telp. : +62562 420 0344
No. Fax. : +62562 420 0584

International Journal of Multi Disipline Science

e-ISSN : 2615-1707