Ironi pada Debat Calon Presiden Indonesia Tahun 2024

Nehemia Anugrah Parasian; Erikson Saragih; Mulyadi Mulyadi; Namira Az-Zahra

doi:10.26737/cling.v8i2.7921

Ironi pada Debat Calon Presiden Indonesia Tahun 2024

Nehemia Anugrah Parasian, Erikson Saragih, Mulyadi Mulyadi, Namira Az-Zahra

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan bentuk, tujuan, dan fungsi ironi yang muncul dalam debat calon presiden Indonesia tahun 2024. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan deskriptif kualitatif dengan model analisis isi dan tematik.Data berupa tuturan para kandidat diambil dari rekaman video keseluruhan debat yang ditayangkan melalui kanal YouTube resmi Komisi Pemilihan Umum (KPU). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan adanya 152 temuan ironi yang terbagi menjadi tiga bentuk: 63 ironi verbal, 38 ironi dramatis, dan 51 ironi situasional. Tujuan penggunaan ironi meliputi mengkritik lawan, membangun citra diri, menciptakan kedekatan dengan publik, menggiring opini sosial, serta menunjukkan inklusivitas. Adapun fungsi tindak tutur yang ditemukan meliputi representatif, direktif, ekspresif, komisif, dan deklaratif, dengan dominasi pada fungsi representatif. Temuan ini memperlihatkan bahwa ironi dalam debat capres berperan sebagai strategi retoris sekaligus instrumen politik yang efektif untuk memengaruhi opini publik dan memperkuat citra kandidat.

Keywords

Ironi; Debat Capres; Tindak Tutur

Full Text:

PDF

References

Agustini Putri, P. D. (2023). Politeness Strategies Used in the First Trump-Clinton Presidential Debate. International Journal of Language and Literature, 6(1), 35–43. https://doi.org/10.23887/ijll.v6i1.46491

Al-Shboul, O. K., Al-Khawaldeh, N. N., Hamdan, H. J., & Alqbailat, N. (2024). Macro and Micro Analysis of Motivational Speech Acts in Biden’s Political Speech. International Journal of Society, Culture and Language, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.22034/ijscl.2024.2016326.3273

Amakali, J. M. L. (2016). Persuasive speech acts in the Namibian National Assembly. Journal Of Advances In Linguistics, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.24297/jal.v7i2.5156

Azka, M. A. K., Eko Purwanto, B., & Triana, L. (2022). Gaya Bahasa Ironi Dan Sarkasme Dalam Kolom Komentar Akun Instagram Tempodotco Dan Implikasinya Terhadap Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia Di SMA. ALINEA : Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra Dan Pengajarannya, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.58218/alinea.v2i2.211

Bărbieru, M. (2022). Adapting Political Communication to Technology. Case Study: Evolutionary Aspects on Social Networks in Romania. Swedish Journal of Romanian Studies, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.35824/sjrs.v5i2.23777

Basri, H., & Efendi, M. (2021). Ethics Political Communication Using Gayo Cultural System Approach (edet gayo). Politik Indonesia: Indonesian Political Science Review, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.15294/ipsr.v6i1.29510

Brock, M. (2018). Political satire and its disruptive potential: irony and cynicism in Russia and the US. Culture, Theory and Critique, 59(3). https://doi.org/10.1080/14735784.2018.1496843

Cahyani, K. P., Ariansyah, Y. T., & Abimubarok, A. (2022). Gaya Bahasa Ironi Stand Up Comedy Mamat Al Katiri dalam Konten Youtube Somasi. REFEREN, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.22236/referen.v1i2.10246

Dalimunte, A., & Wen, F. (2022). Shaping Political Image Through Politeness Strategies in the Presidential Debates. JEES (Journal of English Educators Society), 7(1). https://doi.org/10.21070/jees.v7i1.1660

Dynel, M. (2017). The Irony of Irony: Irony Based on Truthfulness. Corpus Pragmatics, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41701-016-0003-6

Firmansyah, A., Raihani, S. F., Rijkiansyah, A. A. F., Mulyani, H., Imeldasari, I., Vatahhayatia, N. A., Mulyani, S., & Malik, M. (2025). Gaya Bahasa Sarkasme dalam Debat Capres 2024. Bahasa: Jurnal Keilmuan Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia, 6(2), 127–135. https://doi.org/10.26499/bahasa.v6i2.967

Gibbs, R. (2000). Irony in Talk Among Friends. Metaphor and Symbol, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327868ms151&2_2

Golafshani, N. (2015). Understanding Reliability and Validity in Qualitative Research. The Qualitative Report. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2003.1870

Hermawan, V. (2025). Political Communication in the Digital Era: The Role of Social Media in Shaping Public Opinion in the 2024 Election. Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Indonesia (JIM-ID), 4(05), 160–169. https://doi.org/10.58471/esaprom.v4i05

Wilson, D., & Sperber, D. (2008). Relevance Theory. In L. R. Horn & G. Ward (eds.), The Handbook of Pragmatics. Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470756959

Jamieson, K. H. (2024). The Case for General Election Presidential Debates and Debate Reform. Journal of Media Ethics: Exploring Questions of Media Morality, 39(4). https://doi.org/10.1080/23736992.2024.2316028

Kaid, L. L. (2004). Handbook of Political Communication Research. In Lawrence Elrbaum Associates. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410610584

Keraf, G. (2009). Diksi dan Gaya Bahasa. PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Keum, H., & Cho, J. (2021). Presidential debates and voter decision making. Social Science Journal. https://doi.org/10.1080/03623319.2021.1925053

Kraft, P. W., & Klemmensen, R. (2024). Lexical Ambiguity in Political Rhetoric: Why Morality Doesn’t Fit in a Bag of Words. British Journal of Political Science, 54(1). https://doi.org/10.1017/S000712342300008X

Landy, J.A. (1972). A Study of The Short Story. Manila: Jesuit Adecational.

Leong, P. (2015). Political Communication in Malaysia: A Study on the Use of New Media in Politics. EJournal of EDemocracy and Open Government, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.29379/jedem.v7i1.372

Mishra, P., Mirza, A., & Trivedi, P. K. (2025). Changing Landscape Of Political Communication In The Age Of Social Media : A Review Article. 11(12), 1743–1758.

Morales-López, E. (2021). Form-function dialectics in the analysis of irony in political discourse. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics, 34(2). https://doi.org/10.1075/resla.19015.mor

Musdolifah, A., Febriyani, A., Enggar, C. I., Anggraeni, C. S., & Selviana, D. N. D. (2025). Analisis Majas Sindiran pada Debat Calon Presiden Pertama Tahun 2024 dalam Kanal Youtube. Jurnal Bastra, 10(3), 965–975. https://bastra.uho.ac.id/index.php/journal/article/view/1183

Saud, M., Ida, R., Mashud, M., Yousaf, F. N., & Ashfaq, A. (2023). Cultural dynamics of digital space: Democracy, civic engagement and youth participation in virtual spheres. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2023.101904

Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/2218090

Surtikanti, M. W., & Purnomo, K. A. (2023). Uncovering Usa Presidential Debate Genre. Language Literacy: Journal of Linguistics, Literature, and Language Teaching, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.30743/ll.v7i2.8238

Turkenburg, E., & Goovaerts, I. (2024). Food for Thought: A Longitudinal Investigation of Reflection-Promoting Speech in Televised Election Debates (1985–2019). Political Studies, 72(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/00323217221090102

Zahara, E., Yakob, M., & Hidayat, M. T. (2020). Analisis Majas Ironi pada Surat Kabar Prohaba. Jurnal Samudra Bahasa, 4(1).

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26737/cling.v8i2.7921

Refbacks

There are currently no refbacks.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Published by:

Institute of Managing and Publishing of Scientific Journals

STKIP Singkawang

Address : STKIP Singkawang, Jalan STKIP - Kelurahan Naram, Singkawang, Kalimantan Barat, INDONESIA, 79251
No. Telp. : +62562 420 0344
No. Fax. : +62562 420 0584

CAKRAWALA LINGUISTA

e-ISSN : 2597-9787

p-ISSN : 2597-9779