The Effectiveness of Four Corners Strategy in Teaching Writing Hortatory Exposition Text

Monitha Geraldine

Abstract


This research investigated the use of Four Corners Strategy in teaching writing hortatory exposition text to the eleventh-grade students of SMAN 10 Pontianak in academic year 2015/2016. Four Corners is a strategy which allows students to think about a concept from four different perspectives of points of view. A quasi-experimental design was implemented to achieve the purpose of this study. The measurement technique was employed in this research. The data collection instrument was written test. This research used the t-test formula to analyze the quantitative data obtained through written test. Furthermore, an analytic scoring rubric was developed to assess the students’ writing in hortatory exposition text. The result of data analysis revealed the superiority of the experimental group to the control group. Hence, the four corners strategy was effective in helping the students to improve their writing hortatory exposition text.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Anderson, M. and Anderson, K. (1997). Text Types in English. Macmillan: MacMillan Education Australia PTY LTD.

Ary, D., Lucy, C., Jacobs, & Sorensen. (2010). Introduction to Research in Education. Canada: Wadswort, Cencage Learning.

Belcher, D. and Liu, J. (ed). (2004). Genre and Second Language Writing. Michigan: The University of Michigan Press.

Blerkom, M.L.V. (2009). Measurement and Statistics for Teachers. New York: Routledge.

Cohen, L. et al. (2007). Research Methods in Education. Sixth Edition. London and New York: Routledge-Falmer is an imprint of the Taylor and Francis Group.

Crawford, Matheus, Samuel and Makinster, J. (2005). Teaching and Learning Strategies for the Thinking Classroom. New York: The International Debate Education Association.

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research (4th ed). Boston: Pearson Education.

Davis, K. W. (2004). Manage Your Writing. Indiana Polis: Komei Inc.

Depdiknas. (2006). Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan (KTSP). Jakarta: Depdiknas.

Gay, L. R., Mills, G. E., & Airasian, P. W. (2011). Educational Research: Competencies for Analysis and Applications (Tenth ed.). Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education.

Ghaith, G. (2002). Writing. Beirut: American University of Beirut.

Grenville, K. (2001). Writing From Start To Finish A Six-Step Guide. Australia: Griffin Press South.

Guillaume, M. A., Yopp, Helen, R., & Yopp, Kay, H. (2007). 50 Strategies for Active Teaching. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc.

Harmer, J. (2004). How to Teach Writing. London: Longman. Hill Book Company.

Heaton, J. B. (1975). Writing English Language Test. London: Longman.

Johnson, A. P. (2008). Teaching Reading and Writing; A Guidebook for Tutoring and Remediating Students. Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield Education.

Lodigo, M., Spaulding, D., & Voegtle, K. (2010). Methods in Educational Research. San Fransisco: Jossey-Bass.

Marzano, R.J. (2005). A Handbook for Classroom Management that Works. United States: ASCD.

McCaskill. (1998). Grammar, Punctuation and Capitalization. A Handbook for Technical Writers and Editors. Hamptonm Virginia: Langley Research Center.

Meyers, A. (2005). Gateaways to Academic Writing: Effective Sentences, Paragraphs and Essays. United States: Longman.

Nation, I.S.P. (2009). Teaching ESL/EFL Reading and Writing. New York: Routledge.

Priyana, J. (2008). Interlanguage: English for Senior High School Students XII Science and Social Study Program. Jakarta: Pusat Perbukuan, Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.

Rumsey, D. (2010). Statistic Essentials For Dummies. Indiana: Wiley Publishing, Inc.

Samsudi. (2008). Statistika. Semarang: Fakultas Teknik Universitas Negeri Semarang.

Sudarwati and Grace, E. (2007). Look Ahead: An English Course for Senior High School Students Year XI, Science and Social Study Program. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Thompson, S. K. (2002). Sampling. New York: Wiley & Sons.

Walqui, A. (2000). Contextual Factors in Second Language Acquisition. Eric Digest. Washington DC: ERIC Cleaninghouse on Languages and Linguistics. section “The Learning Process”, para. 2.

Weigle, S. C. (2002). Assessing writing. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Westat, J.F. (2002). The 2002 User Friendly Handbook for Project Evaluation. The National Science Foundation: Division of Research, Evaluation and Communication.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26737/ij-mds.v1i1.425

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

INDEXED BY

 

ON PROGRESS INDEXED BY

 

 

Published by:

Institute of Managing and Publishing of Scientific Journals STKIP Singkawang

International Journal of Multi Disipline Science (IJ-MDS)

e-ISSN : 2615-1707

Sekolah Tinggi Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan (STKIP) SIngkawang

Address : STKIP SIngkawang, Jalan STKIP - Kelurahan Naram Singkawang, Kalimantan Barat, INDONESIA, 79251
No. Telp.   : +62562 420 0344
No. Fax.    : +62562 420 0584

Email Cordinator: journal@stkipsingkawang.ac.id / soehartostkipsingkawang@gmail.com /Wa : +6289636659622

Plagiarism Tools

     

  Creative Commons License

International Journal of Multi Disipline Science (IJ-MDS)is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.